Freier._.lance (Offline)  

I've just realised, you haven't put forward a single argument, or even understood mine. Pls don't reply to me again unless you are able to come up with even a single argument, I really don't have the time for anything else, Ty.

'Used to marry brothers and sisters'.

We can assume that they would sleep together - so, that's called incest, bro. You can try to imply anything you like about my intelligence, but one look at your argument reveals who is struggling. You can't even keep up with the amount of rubbish you're coming out with.

Take your pathetic argument and don't return.

How to stigmatise a view that you have attributed to me: mention incest.

Yay, you're the master of debate.

500 million people in Europe, but we must resort to incest. OMG, you're, like, so intelligent.

You honestly don't know how those actions go against the belief that the strong survive? Graduated from UCL? Okay, then. Have a good day.

Science textbooks will enlighten me, will they? Not if I choose a chemistry or physics textbook. Why didn't you just put, 'read a few biology textbooks'? Doesn't sound as impressive as 'science', does it? A lot of science has absolutely nothing to do with genetics. Let me guess, that's irrelevant?

I'm not calling survival of the fittest 'dross'. I'm calling your argument 'dross'. The very fact that you feel the need to include my IQ validates my point. Anyone reading what you have written would think that unless I agree with you, I can't have an IQ of 140. My IQ has nothing to do with science. Science isn't even included on the IQ test. What point are you trying to make?

Survival of the fittest, yeah?

Reasons why it is incompatible:

Hospitals
Pharmaceutical industry
Aid to developing countries
Welfare
Supermarkets

So, Mr Genius, tell me all about your belief? Why do the above exist if we operate on a 'survival of the fittest' basis? I'll tell you why: because we don't. Survival of the fittest is incompatible with the modern world.

Take your 'science' and jog on.

Utter dross dressed up as a fact.

Survival of the fittest is incompatible with the world we live in. So, don't try and insult my intelligence by even speaking about it. If we really abided by this ideology, most of Africa would be dead.

No, I think the immigrants that have settled are from the third world. I do love how liberals try to subvert meaning, though.

Pakistan, India, Nigeria, Somalia, Ghana, etc. = third world.

Why are you so blind? Why do you keep mentioning skin colour? I'm not mentioning skin colour.

My arguments are born out of my experiences.

Why do we need diversity for the strongest genes? The strongest genes are the same ones as a hundred years ago.

You are conflating a challenge with genocide. In what way is seeing my homeland turned into a third-world experiment a challenge? My mind is so boggled at your comment. Are you really that deluded? Do you really believe immigration to be that great? The only challenge is attaining power so that I can remove them from society.

I never once said anything about ethnicity as a boundary to culture. You would do well to read what I actually wrote - not that you can now. I openly admitted that I don't have a problem with black people who have been here for generations. However, I favour white immigration because of a similar culture and history that stretches back over 500 years.

It has nothing to do with your textbook psychology. I understand other cultures. I can adapt to new situations. I would just prefer not to. I would prefer a homogeneous culture.

I didn't mention genes, did I? For the very simple reason that I know culture isn't innate. Despite this, a culture is still ingrained in someone. You spend your first several years of life subconsciously learning the culture.

So take your condescending attitude elsewhere.

'Emotions are a sign of weakness to those who [can't] handle them?' Where do you get this utter dross from? It's certainly not from any validated source. Look at the Soviet Union - do you think their leaders showed emotion range? Nope. In spite of that, they did fairly well for themselves.

Soviet Union - the greatest sporting nation that has ever existed, as validated by their astonishing Olympic success. If you're telling me that this is the best I can do, I'll take it.

'Above average'? *scoff* Yeah, only 40 points above average. I assume it's easier for you to downplay everything, though. I hate to disappoint, but I took the IQ test at school.

Culture is something that is ingrained in someone. You can't just adapt to a new culture. Why do you think first-generation immigrants struggle in new surroundings? Most migration takes place over a few miles for this very reason. It's only a 'weak' argument for those who try to dispute facts. Tell me, why do immigrants band together in areas, if not because it's difficult to adapt to a new culture? Certainly not for the job opportunities.

I study(ied?) Computing; lame course