AnarchistNutter (Offline)

You don't require deep philosophical insight, just understanding or meer introspection.

A point you mentioned which I find rather confusing; "reward must be served according to labour value" well then this would immediately create a hierarchical system. Many could/would exploit others by corrupting power with wealth. From how I see it, who's top say that entryism won't enter the ideology of the set Anarchism? Can't there be an egalitarian perspective towards those who have different labour sets.

Rawls argues that some people have natural talents to become or do great things (almost like a prospect for social upbringing), The ones would talent would easily get on a pyramid, if wealth was distributed evenly then the whole of society would be directed towards greater happiness.

Hello fellow Anarchist, two questions:

Is your view of Anarchism for the enlightenment of self-interest?
Will an authority be manifested in society under Anarchism?

hey, check this: http://zinelibraryDOTinfo/files/anar...altheoryDOTpdf (replace DOTS)
After skimming through it breafly it looks pretty good.

hey, check this: http://zinelibrary.info/files/anarch...icaltheory.pdf
After skimming through it breafly it looks pretty good.

hey, check this: http://zinelibrary.info/files/anarch...icaltheory.pdf
Aftef skimming through it breafly it looks pretty good.

good site, need to do some reading aswell. I'll find something when I look, I don't know if the prospect of Anarchism will ever rise. Maybe when the wall of exploitation is reached, capitalism will fall eventually just maybe not in my life.

Compulsory until the age where one has gathered a stable degree of understanding on what the subject is about and the direction it projects then, students will be able to decide where they want to be. When you say that (to paraphrase)"the problems are that one does not want to learn a certain way", Well the way one is taught should be up to the communes. The confusing thing would be if a student decides they like mutliple workshops, the decision as to where they want to be in the future would be difficult.

I agree but, there should be mix of activities structured in a way that people have a clear preference in to what will be substanstial enough to progress through the society they live it. For instance, recreational activities and those to do with attainment through a academic source(langauges, maths, science etc etc) yes should be divided but people must mix into them 'til a certain age. I reckon one of the most important aspects of life is childhood, what is learnt there can never be unlearnt or forgotten in terms of morality and becoming accustom to social convention.

Bonjour, I read your "rant" on education. It's interesting and very pragmatic(in a philosophical sense). However, choice should only be made of what to study at a set age/mind set and not before options have been seen and demonstrated equally.