whyumadtho (Offline)

Acts 17:26

''And he made from one man every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth, having determined allotted periods and the boundaries of their dwelling place''

Wait until they become the majority.

Let's see how ''cohesive'' society is then.

Sure, people who don't live with them or in their neighbourhoods won't be bothered by their presence.

Are you really saying the people who fought for this country should have no say or opinion of the country because they aren't ''scientists'' ?

Why don't the opinions of soldiers who fought in the war matter ?

Because they aren't ''scientists'' ?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...iors-WWII.html

Did the people who fought for this country want whites to be a minority in London, and many other parts of the UK ?

Did they want ''racial integration'' and ''multiculturalism''.

Their opinion is more important than any scientist.

I'm afraid have given out too much rep already, but thank you for your excellent post in the thread 'London turns white'

If categorising countries is as important as categorising race, then race is important.

No, not really. I could recognise a family member I haven't seen in 40 years. Or an old school teacher. Your brain associates certain attributes and categorises it, it's a survival instinct.

No one who uses race ever defines the races. A policeman hunting a black man, a white serial killer, a Hispanic, etc doesn't have to define each race, he simply goes off instinct.

If I am looking for tigers in the forest, I just know what they look like. I just know.

“race is a social construction.” It’s become too much of a mantra, it’s too much of a shortcut, and it is wildly misunderstood and misinterpreted. A perhaps better phrase–still concise but more accurate, and hopefully less susceptible to misinterpretation, is from John H. Relethford: Race is a “culturally constructed label that crudely and imprecisely describes real variation”