The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1
Andy Murray is a p***k. End of.
Reply 2
I always say a " a question asked gives value to the answer" . The fact that your asking the question suggests they are both boring and devoid of personality , which I think is true in both instances.
I think Henman is pretty boring, at least Murray has some kind of fire, even if it seems a little irritating when he goes off on one.
Reply 4
tim henman, he doesnt ignite the england vs scotland debate
Reply 5
Tim
Tim Henman, everytime.
Reply 7
1721
tim henman, he doesnt ignite the england vs scotland debate


Exactly my point.
venomizer
Andy Murray is a p***k. End of.

He's a prick, but he has a personality, which is being a prick.

But, Henman just had no personality, maybe you could describe him as nice.


Do so as much as i don't like Murry, i have to admit Henmen is more boring.
Reply 9
Oh man

ahahahahahahahahaha
Reply 10
I guess Andy Murray has a personality, whether i like it or not is irrelevant in this instance.

From what i remember of Tim Henman, he was a boring disappointment, not a good combination.
Reply 11
LOL, liking your predictions.
(edited 3 years ago)
Tim Henman.

He was in Persil adverts.
I don't even know why Tim Henman is a commentator now, he hardly says anything worth listening to
Reply 14
PirateFlag
Tim Henman.

He was in Persil adverts.


:rofl:
Reply 15
They are both quite dull. Andy Murray is dull because he acts like a grumpy adolescent. Tim Henman is just devoid of any personality.

Answer: Tim Henman.
Neither are particularly interesting (or good looking).
Reply 17
You appear to have confused 'Andy Murray' with 'Roger Federer'.

Edit-and, much as I like him, gotta be Henman.
(edited 3 years ago)



I bet this is his climax face. Eurghhhh.
Reply 19
I feel I can associate more with Murray's determination. He's a good example to us all

Latest