Husband raped wife on wedding night after she declined him sex

the question is .. why did she decline him sex.. can some up clear this up for me

what....is he trying to be a white knight? lol

tbh, i would feel rather hard done by if i didn't have sex on my wedding night.

Every thread I see aspiringlawstudent posting in he talks like a knob. Can you imagine having him as your solicitor lol.

Oh get off your high horses. Witch hunts aren't being organised here. As already mentioned, the application of the ideology will be defended if one were to end up in a jury box, but the fact of the matter is that the accused man's actions disgusting and unethical.

Who knows, as you say, he could be proven innocent, but hey, he was simply "proven" innocent... on the other hand, is he really?

Those are reasons to get over a person's personality, but surely you could not marry someone who you don't want to have sex with ? That would benefit no one.

maybe, still doesnt give you an excuse to rape your wife.

You're never proven innocent, you're simply proven guilty or not. Innocence is the default state. I could accuse you of all kinds of slanderous things, but the fact of the matter is that they wouldn't be your actions unless I provided some evidence. That's how civilised society works, and in my opinion it's something worth getting on a high horse about.

He never said he would rape his wife though, he would probably feel a little annoyed as most people do have sex on their wedding night

None of us have any idea whether the man did these things or not. The article doesn't tell us what evidence has been presented. I'm surprised how people are prepared to assume that everything the woman says is true.

I would want to see the evidence before reaching a conclusion, but my gut reaction is that the woman is massively exaggurating. On the one hand, the woman claims she was so drunk on her wedding night that she passed out during sex. On the other hand, she claims she explained to him that "just because I am married I still have the right to say no" and remembers this two years later. I find it difficult to believe that she made a reasoned statement about her rights while passing in and out of consciousness. It also sounds very unlikely that the man raped her whilst she had stiches following having a baby just because he had a sense of "entitlement".

im assuming your pretty young because two years is not long for an adult relationship, let alone marriage

its likely and seems the abuse got worse as she was married, and after a very little time of 2 years she is in court. not forgetting it often takes many months for a trial especially one such as this to get to court.

think before you post please

Yeah but, this is just a forum where people are just discussing how the supposed actions are terrible. We have no power over the case. We don't know what evidence there is. There's no point us saying, 'this might have happened, this might not have happened' ... we don't even know their names. Nothing's going to happen from this discussion for the man and woman involved in this case.

how do you know this, have you spent many a night in a newly wedded couples closet?

None of us have any idea whether the man did these things or not. The article doesn't tell us what evidence has been presented. I'm surprised how people are prepared to assume that everything the woman says is true.

I would want to see the evidence before reaching a conclusion. However my gut reaction is that some of the allegations are untrue or exaggurated. On the one hand, she claims she was so drunk that she passed out during sex. On the other hand, she claims she explained to him "just because I am married I still have the right to say no" and remembers this two years later. To me this sounds unlikely. People don't normally make reasoned statements about their rights while passing in and out of consciousness.