The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

Reply 20
You're not including Gauss Dayo?
Reply 21
1. Newton
2. Newton
3. Newton
4. Newton
5. Newton

in no particular order. :biggrin:
Reply 22
DFranklin;
generalebriety;
Chewwy;
James;
Kolya.

Also in no particular order.

:ninja:
Reply 23
yusufu
DFranklin;
generalebriety;
Chewwy;
James;
Kolya.

Also in no particular order.

:ninja:
Correction:

1.Dadeyemi;
a.generalebriety;
b.Chewwy;
c.James;
d.Kolya.

where {a,b,c,d} is some permutation of {2,3,4,5}

:yep:
Reply 24
Dadeyemi
Correction:

1.Dadeyemi;
a.generalebriety;
b.Chewwy;
c.James;
d.Kolya.

where {a,b,c,d} is some permutation of {2,3,4,5}

:yep:

lol. I was going to put myself in the list, but I realised that I transcend greatness. Oh yes.
Reply 25
Holy thread revival Batman.

Edit: in other news, I would probably swap 2. and 3. in my list. Maybe swap 4. and 5. as well.
Einstein, Galileo, Newton, Euler, Gauss - no particular order.

Here come the shouts about he's a physicist, not a mathematician.

Spoiler

Reply 27
Pythagoras
Newton
Euler
Achemides
Fermat
Euclid
(No order)
I know nothing of past mathematicians to have any sort of informed opinion, but Ramanujan's story is fascinating. Died so young too.

I am amazed how many of these guys are virtually self-taught.
Reply 29
Not as young as Galois...
Reply 30
euler
gauss
hilbert
riemann
leibniz

no particular order
Grothendieck
Riemann
Gauss
Godel
Galois
Reply 32
1.) Simplicity
2.) Simplicity
3.) Simplicity
4.) Simplicity
5.) Simplicity

1.) Simplicity
2.) Simplicity
3.) Simplicity
4.) Simplicity
5.) Simplicity

1000000000000000000000001)DeanK2

P.S. Newton is not a mathematician, nor is Einstein.
Simplicity
1000000000000000000000001)DeanK2

P.S. Newton is not a mathematician, nor is Einstein.

Didn't Newton study maths at cambridge? Everyone had to at that time but that's beside the point.
Didn't Newton study maths at cambridge? Everyone had to at that time but that's beside the point.

No, he did philosophy. Cambridge is pretty crappy for maths during the time of Newton. Its only till Hardy came along did they start actually doing Maths and not Physics.
XShmalX
Pythagoras
Newton
Euler
Achemides
Fermat
Euclid
(No order)


Someone obviously can't count.
Reply 37
1) Gauss
2) Euler
3) Cantor
4) Riemann
5) Grothendieck

woo first person to choose Cantor
This isnt' the best place to discuss such questions, I don't even know if there is such a place.

5 is too low a number to depict all the great achievements by mathematicians throughout history. This seems to be a list very biased towards the Western reader, who may have been brought up to think only the Western world can produce 'great mathematicians'.

From era of Euclid to generation of Gauss, there is a huge gap of more than a millennium. Which is left empty in these discussions.

5 is too low a number to fairly depict all the subfields within mathematics today.
Reply 39
Simplicity
1000000000000000000000001)DeanK2

P.S. Newton is not a mathematician, nor is Einstein.


he was a mathematician. he did something to do with calculus.

Latest