|
07-09-2005: 7th September 2005 14:10
|
#16
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Salford, UK
Posts: 32
|
|
|
To be honest the whole "press freedom" issue has been going around in circles for years, and stems from the fact that the YUSU trustees (that is, the Executive) would be responsible if the student press (or broadcast media, for that matter) got into legal or financial trouble.
However, it is a shame that this all came to a head because the then-President wanted to save his best mate some embarassment after he'd viciously bottled an innocent bystander in a club.
In essence, the logic is that a student on trial (or convicted) is still a student whose welfare requires protection, and to allow the campus media to cover the story is a threat to that student's welfare.
I don't think it is a very good argument. I think students have a right to know if someone in their midst has committed a violent offence. Likewise, another time a similar logic was used, the student press were unable to name a student convicted of drink-driving. Personally I'd say the welfare of anyone he might subsequently offer a lift to is more important that protecting the anonymity of a convicted drunk-driver.
|
|
|
|