Medical Universities stance on candidates resitting to get an A*?

Discussion for A-Level students and for those choosing their A-Level subjects.

This thread is sponsored by:
Announcements Posted on
Please change your TSR password 20-06-2013
Important: please read these guidelines before posting about exams on The Student Room 28-04-2013
Sign in to Reply
  1. Dreamweaver's Avatar
    • Benevolent Member
    • Location: London
    • Posts: 847
    Medical Universities stance on candidates resitting to get an A*?
    Which would medical universities prefer in general:

    A candiate with A*A*AA without resitting any modules?

    Or A*A*A*A* with two module resists?
  2. Pride's Avatar
    • TSR Demigod
    • Location: London
    Re: Medical Universities stance on candidates resitting to get an A*?
    I don't know. It would always depend on the school.

    But wait a minute? What would the grades be before the resits? If it was straight As, it would be stupid to resit just to get straight A*s unless an A* was a requirement for Oxbridge or something.

    or would it be something like BBBB, and those A*s are obtained after resits?

    Either way, many universities do not accept resits, so these universities would be completely off your list straight away. Then there are some that say it is a factor, then there are some that say it's not considered if there are less than a certain number of resits.
  3. Dreamweaver's Avatar
    • Benevolent Member
    • Location: London
    • Posts: 847
    Re: Medical Universities stance on candidates resitting to get an A*?
    (Original post by Pride)
    I don't know. It would always depend on the school.

    But wait a minute? What would the grades be before the resits? If it was straight As, it would be stupid to resit just to get straight A*s unless an A* was a requirement for Oxbridge or something.

    or would it be something like BBBB, and those A*s are obtained after resits?

    Either way, many universities do not accept resits, so these universities would be completely off your list straight away. Then there are some that say it is a factor, then there are some that say it's not considered if there are less than a certain number of resits.
    I'm in year 13. My situation is that i already have an A* in maths and i'm very likely to get another A* in further maths, given the fact i've already got 95+ UMS in two of the three required modules. I'm also doing biology and chemistry. However, come results day in a few weeks; if my UMS scores in the biology and chemistry modules i took were not high enough for an A*, would it be wise to resit those individual modules to get an A* in june? Or is it better to settle with A's?
  4. Helloworld_95's Avatar
    • Peer Of The TSR Realm
    • Posts: 1,514
    Re: Medical Universities stance on candidates resitting to get an A*?
    Settle with A's, no med schools care after 2A*'s and only one cares for 2A*'s and that's if you get a C in the 3rd a level.
  5. deniu3545's Avatar
    • Exalted Member
    • Posts: 285
    Re: Medical Universities stance on candidates resitting to get an A*?
    You haven't got a chance at med school with those grades anyway. You need a minimum of 6 A2's for a Med course really, you need to look at it: are you clever enough? it's harsh but it's the truth.
  6. DScofield's Avatar
    • Exalted Member
    • Posts: 391
    Re: Medical Universities stance on candidates resitting to get an A*?
    (Original post by matthurry)
    You haven't got a chance at med school with those grades anyway. You need a minimum of 6 A2's for a Med course really, you need to look at it: are you clever enough? it's harsh but it's the truth.
    If you're going to be sarcastic/troll then at least be funny.
  7. Kingbradley6's Avatar
    • Benevolent Member
    • Location: UK
    • Posts: 613
    Re: Medical Universities stance on candidates resitting to get an A*?
    They wouldn't care either way, unless you're resitting the modules outside of the two year period. If it's just an extra module within the two year period then no-one cares as no university can even see module resits except Cambridge in which you have to specify your module marks and any resits on their SAQ beforehand. But even then they don't mind a couple of resits.

    If you're in year 13 you have an offer already? Or planning a gap year? If the former then you know your conditions; if the latter then what I said above applies.
  8. Dreamweaver's Avatar
    • Benevolent Member
    • Location: London
    • Posts: 847
    Re: Medical Universities stance on candidates resitting to get an A*?
    Question answered. Thanks for the helpful replies. Well, mostly
  9. Pride's Avatar
    • TSR Demigod
    • Location: London
    Re: Medical Universities stance on candidates resitting to get an A*?
    (Original post by Dreamweaver)
    I'm in year 13. My situation is that i already have an A* in maths and i'm very likely to get another A* in further maths, given the fact i've already got 95+ UMS in two of the three required modules. I'm also doing biology and chemistry. However, come results day in a few weeks; if my UMS scores in the biology and chemistry modules i took were not high enough for an A*, would it be wise to resit those individual modules to get an A* in june? Or is it better to settle with A's?
    I would settle for the As. If you held an offer, it wouldn't make much difference. If you didn't, and want to apply next year with your A-levels done, it wouldn't make much of a difference past the first A* probably, I mean, the requirement is 3 As, that's what the offers are.
    Last edited by Pride; 23-02-2012 at 07:50.
Sign in to Reply
Share this discussion:  
Article updates
Moderators

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 volunteers looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Reputation gems:
The Reputation gems seen here indicate how well reputed the user is, red gem indicate negative reputation and green indicates a good rep.
Post rating score:
These scores show if a post has been positively or negatively rated by our members.