I fail to understand the purpose of your argument other than dissuade eligible hopefuls from applying, when the prospective applicants reading this are and rightly
should be aware of quackery from discredited institutions here and abroad, which has been said and reiterated by several people including myself, and it is quite evident that despite competition for training posts, there are medical jobs available (including staff grades, LAT/LAS, short-term locums and part-time contracts, associate specialists, clinical fellowships and other roles in medical education, etc, etc). Part of what I said in previous comments, was about how medicine is not a race or a competition, though some make it out to be, and that people should take their time in their aspiration to become a consultant as many of our experienced senior doctors have, therefore the notion of medicine being "competitive" is only true, when those vying for
training posts at reputable hospitals in reputable specialties act competitively despite there being alternative career pathways.
P.S. Just to put things into perspective for you about the need for doctors from here and abroad, 37% of the entire working cohort of doctors obtained their degrees abroad (2009 - 3 years ago) -
http://www.gmc-uk.org/Illing___The_experiences_of_UK_EU_and_non_EU_graduates.pdf_30868612.pdf, this is across board at F1/F2, SHO, registrar and consultancy level.