Is Tom Burrin the most biased historian of all time?
Discuss issues related to past events, people, places, or old empires and civilisations.
| Announcements | Posted on | |
|---|---|---|
| TSR launches Learn Together! - Our new subscription to help improve your learning | 16-05-2013 | |
-
View Poll Results: Is Tom Burrin a biased historian?
Yes 2 20.00% No 2 20.00% I don't know who he is? 6 60.00%
-
- Reputation:
- Exalted Member
- Location: Aberdeen
- Posts: 304
Re: Is Tom Burrin the most biased historian of all time?I disagree, of course no Historians views are purely objective, as long as he justifies why he thinks the protectorate collapsed, due to N factor, he can say what he wants.
Last edited by khaiser turian; 03-05-2012 at 13:39. -
- Reputation:
- Overlord in Training
- Posts: 2,601
Re: Is Tom Burrin the most biased historian of all time?Don't know who he is. All I know is that anything about the Protectorate is incredibly boring and dull as dishwater. I feel sorry for historians who have to write about the Protectorate, but then, I guess someone has to.
-
- Reputation:
- Exalted Member
- Location: Aberdeen
- Posts: 304
Re: Is Tom Burrin the most biased historian of all time?I don't think he just writes on the Protectorate, he has written a few books on the German Empire at the dawn of the 20th Century, and he has a passion for the chartists(Original post by navarre)
Don't know who he is. All I know is that anything about the Protectorate is incredibly boring and dull as dishwater. I feel sorry for historians who have to write about the Protectorate, but then, I guess someone has to.
