[Multitalented me]

If exam/coursework marks were only based on this instead of how efficiently you absorb information or how good your memory is what difference do you think it would make to your grades?

[localfox1000]

By work you mean more revising, or more time given to do a test ?

[ghanglish]

I would have got into Cambridge.

[KCosmo]

I would have done terrible at subjects that I'm good at, like physics and music, because I didn't really have to spend much time on them.

Would have done good in English though, I spent ages on it because I knew I was terrible at it. Overall I would have done much worse if it was just based on time spent working

[Sir Fox]

I would now refill supermarket shelves with the prospect of doing that the next 50 years instead of studying Psychology at uni. Hell I'm lazy ...

[Multitalented me]

(Original post by ghanglish)
I would have got into Cambridge.

I feel your pain bro

[canŵio]

I would have probably got E,E,U...

[confuzzled92]

I'd have obtained A* in my 3 subjects and 49 other subjects across 4 different exam boards.

[caiitlinz]

I would have done great in a few of my Int 2's then drastically failed my Highers.

[buildalegohouse]

Cambridge here I come. -.-

[lightburns]

My GCSEs would have been Es. I did zero revision for GCSEs. Zero.

[halbeth]

(Original post by lightburns)
My GCSEs would have been Es. I did zero revision for GCSEs. Zero.

Likewise, I'd probably be living on the streets right now if this is how it worked ><

[SpringNicht]

I'd fail everything ever.

[Mike93L]

I would not have got into any of the unis I applied to.

[.snowflake.]

I would have done rubbish in everything at GCSE with the exception of latin. Done alright at AS, better than I did anyhow. Got an A* in Unit 4 Chemistry in january, but probably nearly failed biology.