You are Here: Home >< Maths

# Gradient of unit vectors in Spherical Coords

Announcements Posted on
Last day to win £100 of Amazon vouchers - don't miss out! Take our quick survey to enter 24-10-2016
1. Hi there,

I'm doing a past paper (second year physics) and it's asking about the gradient of a cartesian coordinate z in terms of and . The question is as follows:
In terms of spherical polar coordinates the Cartesian coordinates are given by
; and
Furthermore

(ii) Express in terms of and .
Okay, so I attempted to use the definition of gradient in spherical coordinates:

Where (I assume this is correct for spherical - it works in Cartesian at least!)
But this doesn't give the correct result when applied to the vector given in the question.
After a bit of playing around with it I realised that it works if

And this gives the correct value as provided in the mark scheme. I emailed my lecturer and he replied and said:
The correct formula is

this simply requires the function of a function rule.
Which seems to be in contradiction to every textbook and internet resource I can find. How can this be correct?

But taking what he said about a function of a function rule I deduce that

If I substitute df, dr etc for etc then it seems to work, but that doesn't feel 'right' as I'd have to define an infinitesimal change in these quantities to be equal to their gradient...which just sounds plain wrong to me.
So, anyone got any ideas about how this might be resolved?

Thanks for taking the time to read this - please don't let my beautiful latex-ing go to waste!

(oh and apparently this question is suppose to take under 5 minutes)

is really, taking a component at a time, three scalar formulas in one:

Those all look to me like applications of the chain rule.
3. (Original post by Jonny W)

is really, taking a component at a time, three scalar formulas in one:

Those all look to me like applications of the chain rule.
Yes, I think I can see how this works. By taking the sum (with the appropriate unit vectors put in place?) and then factorising, the expressions for gradient can be obtained.

Thanks!

## Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
1. this can't be left blank
2. this can't be left blank
3. this can't be left blank

6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

4. this can't be left empty
1. Oops, you need to agree to our Ts&Cs to register

Updated: June 3, 2012
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Today on TSR

### How does exam reform affect you?

From GCSE to A level, it's all changing

Poll
Useful resources

### Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read here first

### How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

### Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams