The Student Room Group

Edexcel Economics Unit 4: 20th June 2012

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1160
Original post by Scotty93
Chose the 3rd essay about globalisation which went expectedly well. Didn't really encounter any major problems with it. Then picked the 2nd data response, related to the budget deficit. Struggled with the second question, which wanted to know why countries outside the eu experienced more promising growth rates in comparison to eu member countries. Does anyone have any solid points with regards to this question? All i remember writing about is that since some eu countries are performing poorly, any demand for foreign imports will subsequently fall. In turn, trade between the countries will deterioate, having a knock-on effect upon other eu countries. More importantly, though, the imposition of a common external tariff will restrict free trade with outside countries, further hampering any potential trade. Might have thought of a few more points but can't remember at the moment.


I think my answers are wrong but i wrote
- maybe outside the eu different sectors are more important for example eu countries relied more on manufactured sector " collapse in construction activity " i quoted. Whereas uk is more on financial services which are less income elastic and so in the reccesion eu is worse of
-talked about single currency within eu and fears of greece defaulting hence lower growth due to capital flight and lack of investment as investors feared their assets losing value overnight
- at the end i quickly added that house price falls were huge in eu so neg wealth effect causing low consumption society

Evaluation was tooo rubbish and hard!
Reply 1161
Original post by XO*
Anyone do the Globalisation essay?
Something like:
a) Assess the significance of Transnationals in increased Globalisation

b) To what extent to the costs of globalisation outweigh the benefits.


Yes. I predicted there would be an essay on causes and cost and benefits, so I was thrilled when those two came up. How did you find it?
Reply 1162
Original post by PPF
I think my answers are wrong but i wrote
- maybe outside the eu different sectors are more important for example eu countries relied more on manufactured sector " collapse in construction activity " i quoted. Whereas uk is more on financial services which are less income elastic and so in the reccesion eu is worse of
-talked about single currency within eu and fears of greece defaulting hence lower growth due to capital flight and lack of investment as investors feared their assets losing value overnight
- at the end i quickly added that house price falls were huge in eu so neg wealth effect causing low consumption society

Evaluation was tooo rubbish and hard!


They all sound pretty valid don't think any of them are wrong. in fact, i wish i wrote about the last two, both seem like really good points. even if they're wrong, i would like to think the examier will give you a mark or two for your good economic knowledge
Original post by Scotty93
Chose the 3rd essay about globalisation which went expectedly well. Didn't really encounter any major problems with it. Then picked the 2nd data response, related to the budget deficit. Struggled with the second question, which wanted to know why countries outside the eu experienced more promising growth rates in comparison to eu member countries. Does anyone have any solid points with regards to this question? All i remember writing about is that since some eu countries are performing poorly, any demand for foreign imports will subsequently fall. In turn, trade between the countries will deterioate, having a knock-on effect upon other eu countries. More importantly, though, the imposition of a common external tariff will restrict free trade with outside countries, further hampering any potential trade. Might have thought of a few more points but can't remember at the moment.


I'm sure the GDP question talked about 'the averaged' amount of the Eurozone, and the data referred to Germany's 'booming' manufacturing economy, whilst Greece, Ireland,etc had negative growth, thus obviously to some extent this would drag down the average hence why the UK, etc had stronger growth. Might be wrong though. I found that the Extracts and figures was very useful, even for questions which didn't ask for it.
Original post by Tsunami2011
:lol: That is why I like finishing every question before I move on. When I finished, I just went back to the 30 marker and tried adding some random stuff in the hope of marks.

Hope you make your Notts offer!

I usually try to finish my questions before moving on but I was stuck and I didn't want to waste any more time. Gah, imagine if I realized that I've not finish that question when there is just one minute left! Oh well, it's done..

Thanks! :biggrin: I'm sure you can meet your Warwick offer as well!
Original post by ss13
yeah got into harvard yale and stamford.


*Stanford
Reply 1166
Original post by Scotty93
Chose the 3rd essay about globalisation which went expectedly well. Didn't really encounter any major problems with it. Then picked the 2nd data response, related to the budget deficit. Struggled with the second question, which wanted to know why countries outside the eu experienced more promising growth rates in comparison to eu member countries. Does anyone have any solid points with regards to this question? All i remember writing about is that since some eu countries are performing poorly, any demand for foreign imports will subsequently fall. In turn, trade between the countries will deterioate, having a knock-on effect upon other eu countries. More importantly, though, the imposition of a common external tariff will restrict free trade with outside countries, further hampering any potential trade. Might have thought of a few more points but can't remember at the moment.


I struggled with that one too! But I think the point I focused on most was how the Eurozone countries had a set monetary policy for all of them, whereas the UK can chose a monetary policy that would increase growth (0.5%) and used examples from the text like Germany would need to have high and italy perhaps low? But the question was so ambiguous I really think what you wrote was fine, I was annoyed at myself at the time for not being able to think of anymore points and my evaluation was poor :frown:
Original post by AK0001
76 for an a*? When has it ever been that high...?


I'm sure in the past two years it has been 74 and 73. Should be around that again. Should be around 80 for 120UMS which I need close to fml.
Reply 1168
Original post by hellie7
I struggled with that one too! But I think the point I focused on most was how the Eurozone countries had a set monetary policy for all of them, whereas the UK can chose a monetary policy that would increase growth (0.5%) and used examples from the text like Germany would need to have high and italy perhaps low? But the question was so ambiguous I really think what you wrote was fine, I was annoyed at myself at the time for not being able to think of anymore points and my evaluation was poor :frown:


For that question do you remember if you had to compare eu member to non ey member in eurozone e.g. Uk or anywhere outside eu e.g China/ India
Reply 1169
Original post by Gemxx
For that question do you remember if you had to compare eu member to non ey member in eurozone e.g. Uk or anywhere outside eu e.g China/ India


It was other, non-euro, EU members.
Reply 1170
Original post by Gemxx
For that question do you remember if you had to compare eu member to non ey member in eurozone e.g. Uk or anywhere outside eu e.g China/ India


No you can't use China/India, it was countries in the EU but not in the Eurozone.
I think they mentioned Britain, Sweden and Poland in the question or somewhere in the extract.

Question was okay, I know one of my points was the fact that these countries had independent monetary policies, and I mentioned Eurozone having strict convergence criterion on the level of Fiscal Deficit as a percentage of GDP.
Reply 1171
Original post by kurdabora
That's the thing I used comparative advantage on part A so couldn't use it on part B. so I used other benefits such as cheaper prices more employment and another benefit.

And yh timing was bad for me too I was worried I got the part A and B completely wrong. Ended up missing the 10 marker on capitalism.


This was posted from The Student Room's iPhone/iPad Appo


i used it on both, evaluation for part A and for a point for part B
Why did you not use it in both?
I mentioned that keeping the debt high so long breaks the terms of joining the Eurozone in that question I think. Economics markschemes are always so hard to predict so I will not try.
Reply 1173
Original post by XO*
No you can't use China/India, it was countries in the EU but not in the Eurozone.
I think they mentioned Britain, Sweden and Poland in the question or somewhere in the extract.

Question was okay, I know one of my points was the fact that these countries had independent monetary policies, and I mentioned Eurozone having strict convergence criterion on the level of Fiscal Deficit as a percentage of GDP.


Yeah, I wrote that, with my second point being that they can use expansionary fiscal policy even if fiscally in deficit which the Eurozone countries aren't allowed to (or deterred from doing so) under the stability and growth pact

Eval was that Germany was an exception and that the UK's economy shrunk in 2011 so the early trends from the first 9 months of 2010 didn't indicate sustained growth
Reply 1174
Original post by kurdabora
I did Q3 the one in globalisation but I think I completely messed up.

Part A was asses the significance of TNCs for the increase in globalisation?

I did this :
Talked about TNCs and how they help globalisation and what not.

Talked about other things that increase globalisation. Like cheaper transport

3rd point was the increase in trade linearisation i.e WTO getting rid of barriers and talked about comparative advantage specialise in goods etc etc.

And then evaluated each point.
What I'm concerned about is part b said outweigh the costs and benefits or something long those lines. So was I meant to talk about comparative advantage in the second part or first??
Are my points valid for part A?


This was posted from The Student Room's iPhone/iPad Appo


For part A: I did the same analysis points as you, so I really hope they're valid !
But cannot remember how I evaluated, all I remember was writing a final judgement saying that TNC's are not a cause but something that's possible due to globalisation :/

Part B: comparative advantage would be in the 2nd part since it is a benefit, rather than a cause (part A)
(edited 11 years ago)
Reply 1175
I think I did alright in this paper answered question 3 in section A which I thought was alright but spent way too much time on it.

section B i chose question 4; to do with inequality- was really pushed for time
- part a was fine
- part b (lorenz curve) my mind went blank and i forgot the axes! so all i wrote was gini coefficient formula.
- part c: capitalism! DAMN, i just wrote that entrepreneurs would need low skilled works ? is that write or completely stupid :confused:
- part d: can't remember but I think it was quite an odd question for some reason
- part e: spoke about fiscal policy, increase progressive taxes. supply side: increase geographical mobility of labour and referred to the extract. and also, spoke about subsidies linked to the extract :biggrin: just wish I had 5 more minutes to round of my answer

are these points any good ? and what was question 4d ? lol
Reply 1176
does any one remember question 5? part (b),(c) and (d),many thanks.
Reply 1177
Original post by Tsunami2011
I'm sure in the past two years it has been 74 and 73. Should be around that again. Should be around 80 for 120UMS which I need close to fml.


That's exactly what I thought, hoping I got 74 :frown:, need it so bad.
Reply 1178
Original post by kim192
does any one remember question 5? part (b),(c) and (d),many thanks.


the ones i can remember were

1) why non eurozone, EU countries grew faster than eurozone countries in the first 9 months of 2010

2) policies to improve competitiveness of Portuguese, Italian and Irish goods and services

3) should a large budget deficit be immediately dealt with, by the government
Reply 1179
Original post by XO*
No you can't use China/India, it was countries in the EU but not in the Eurozone.
I think they mentioned Britain, Sweden and Poland in the question or somewhere in the extract.

Question was okay, I know one of my points was the fact that these countries had independent monetary policies, and I mentioned Eurozone having strict convergence criterion on the level of Fiscal Deficit as a percentage of GDP.


Oh noo!! I knew I didn't read the 10 mark question properly ... I did outside of the EU :frown:

How many marks do you think I will lose and I thought it was an alright question .. I did talk about strict monetary policy and the strict convergence criteria .. how many marks do you think I'll lose :frown: :frown:

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending