M108 - Motion on the EU Aviation Security Rules
TSR's model parliament.
| Announcements | Posted on | |
|---|---|---|
| TSR launches Learn Together! - Our new subscription to help improve your learning | 16-05-2013 | |
-
Re: M105 - Motion on the EU Aviation Security Rules
A lot has happened since 2006, a European Aviation Safety Agency has been established.
Please look at all EU Legislation before bringing legislation to this House.
Here is a website for you, the European Commission Transport website: http://ec.europa.eu/transport/index_en.htmLast edited by Morgsie; 13-07-2012 at 18:57. -
Re: M105 - Motion on the EU Aviation Security Rules
I am the writer.
How is that relevant? These regulations are still in effect and I experienced them twice last month.(Original post by Morgsie)
A lot has happened since 2006, a European Aviation Safety Agency has been established.
Please look at all EU Legislation before bringing legislation to this House.
Here is a website for you, the European Commission Transport website: http://ec.europa.eu/transport/index_en.htm -
Re: M105 - Motion on the EU Aviation Security RulesYou could have looked at newer Legislation, understanding it all is a different matter. I don't know if that is still in effect.(Original post by Life_peer)
I am the writer.
How is that relevant? These regulations are still in effect and I experienced them twice last month.
I don't know much about it all TBHLast edited by Morgsie; 13-07-2012 at 19:20. -
Re: M105 - Motion on the EU Aviation Security RulesThen how can you assume that I have not? That is why I am telling you that these regulations are still in effect, which you can see here, for example.(Original post by Morgsie)
You could have looked at newer Legislation, understanding it all is a different matter. I don't know if that is still in effect.
I don't know much about it all TBH -
Re: M105 - Motion on the EU Aviation Security RulesYou are not. As I have written, you can have knives with blades shorter than 6 cm in hand luggage as well as up to 100 ml of mouthwash in a single container, up to 1000 ml of all liquids combined. You can naturally put as much of it as you wish to the checked (hold) luggage.(Original post by tehFrance)
I didn't see this in the sub forum... that said, it is hand luggage and in the hand luggage you cannot have knives but you can in holding luggage, you cannot have mouthwash in either if I am correct.
Against this motion. -
Re: M105 - Motion on the EU Aviation Security Rules
Btw I haven't ever had much problem with this personally. At most I've had water which I've had to thrown away to then buy water on the other side for inflated price. That said with things like mouthwash you don't have have that with you on a plane. I'm sure you can survive a plane journey without mouthwash.
I think in this case the only issue is with baby milk in bottles. What else is so vital that it cannot wait mere hours until the destination has been reached? Excluding medicines I might add. -
Re: M105 - Motion on the EU Aviation Security Rules
Well, what with many airlines charging for hold baggage (not to mention the inconvenience of check baggage), then we face the stark choice between paying for a bag in the hold, or paying for a load of travel-sized toiletries. I'm not sure what the current risks are, or the effectiveness of screening liquids, my gut would say it's a bit over-bearing, but I'd like to look at things more clearly.
Of course, all the stuff above is decisions that should be made by private companies, the airlines and the airport operators - not enshrined in law. As such, I'd support the repeal of the law. -
Re: M105 - Motion on the EU Aviation Security Rules
There is one advantage to the current rules- it stopped Ryanair from a 'cabin baggage only' policy.
For those of us that prefer a pleasant flying experience, the rules are non-sensical. Just require liquids to be placed separately in a clear plastic bag through scanning. -
Re: M105 - Motion on the EU Aviation Security RulesIn addition to the number of other bills released (and a further 3+ in the next week).(Original post by internetguru)
As usual the government are getting their priorities right.
1. liquid on plane legislation
2. celebrate jubilee motions
.......
99. economy/jobs/spending and all that useless stuff
You are well aware from your time in government that we are announcing all our economic measures at the same time, in the budget to be released within the next two weeks (just finalizing the date). -
Re: M105 - Motion on the EU Aviation Security RulesOk well I'm just making sure, I don't want to see you play the weak sauce card real life parties play when they say they will do all their first election promises in their second term.(Original post by Rakas21)
In addition to the number of other bills released (and a further 3+ in the next week).
You are well aware from your time in government that we are announcing all our economic measures at the same time, in the budget to be released within the next two weeks (just finalizing the date). -
Re: M105 - Motion on the EU Aviation Security RulesI used mouthwash just as an example because I need to have my dental care kit available at all times – checked luggage could get lost and returning it takes tens of hours.(Original post by thunder_chunky)
Btw I haven't ever had much problem with this personally. At most I've had water which I've had to thrown away to then buy water on the other side for inflated price. That said with things like mouthwash you don't have have that with you on a plane. I'm sure you can survive a plane journey without mouthwash. […]
As an another example, and perhaps a more widely accepted one, people traveling only with cabin luggage are forced to either not carry liquids (e.g. alcoholic beverages as mentioned below) or buy them after the control point, usually more expensive.
I agree. In case of flights originating from within the EU, the law should only limit them from introducing inadequate measures.(Original post by jesusandtequila)
[…] Of course, all the stuff above is decisions that should be made by private companies, the airlines and the airport operators - not enshrined in law. As such, I'd support the repeal of the law.
From another point of view, it requires those who, for example, wanted to bring some booze with them as a form of gift to travel with two suitcases. Ideally, both options should be allowed.(Original post by barnetlad)
There is one advantage to the current rules- it stopped Ryanair from a 'cabin baggage only' policy. […]Last edited by Life_peer; 16-07-2012 at 09:22.