I posted my reply on a similar thread on this forum, but ill post again:
People just try and make themselves feel better and delude themselves they have more free time than they actually have to soften the blow. Its just not the case. There are even books like Vanderkams 168 hours that show you how you can alledgedly have some sort of fulfilling life around work because a week is a long time.
Its just not. People will say 40 hours work and 56 hours sleep still leaves 72 hours in a week free.
It doesn’t at all. I have to travel to work and back. If its busy in the city, that’s 2 hours travelling, so theres 10 hours gone. Work wont pay you for lunch, theres another 5, and the time before work is going to be spent on next to nothing useful. Showering, breakfast, getting ready for the day? Id guess that’s 7.5 hours a week youd say? That’s not too bad an estimate?
So now, without doing any more time at work, your “free time” is 49.5 hours. But really, is it? What about having to eat? Go shopping? what about having to clean the apartment? What about having to do all of your laundry and iron all your clothes? This is going to take your free time down even further, if you loosely class these activities as “free time”.
Vanderkam would just say to hell with it. Outsource all these areas of your life. Pay for a cleaner. Pay for someone to launder your clothes. Yeah right, you cant afford to do that. As if that’s realistic to suggest that to anyone other than someone on a significant salary, who is probably working longer anyway.
So by my calculations, even with working a 40 hour week which most would say is short or “normal”, and not wasting any time, youre still left with what, 45 hours a week?
That might sound reasonable, ish, but what happens if you have to do say 5 hours overtime? What about having to travel to things and back for a hobby? What about those things ive not scheduled, doctor, dentist, all of those?
Im saying youd have realistically 40-45 hours “free” if you didn’t have one single minute of NON SCHEDULED TIME. Youd have that amount of time if you never sat down for a moment and reflected. Or never just spent some time recovering on nothing in particular. Or never had a lie in a little bit longer one day as you were tired.
Its simply not realistic to think that youll utilise all your time non stop, by doing something non stop. People don’t function that way, and a certain amount of time will be wasted by necessity for this reason. Especially if your job is in any way active, youll have to take some time out just to gather yourself.
So your work life balance will become like so many peoples…….work 40 hours, probably more, do all the travelling and such, in return for a few hours on a Friday night in a nightclub. Or all your work time for a few hours at football on a Saturday.
If that’s a balance, then it doesn’t fit what my notion of a balance is.
The reality is, that ive found since working full time, is that your mates will probably do the same, and youll just give up on having a life or the activities within it you used to do, because you cant do them. You cant go to the gym, play football, watch tv, read a book, play an instrument, browse online, maintain a happy relationship and work. There isn’t time. So you just start giving things up. Soon enough, you get exactly what you didn’t want, work is your life.
Id like to say there is a way around it. The one hope you’ve got, is if you GENUINELY like your job. Not many do.