Why does the BoP current account trade deficit actually matter? I keep thinking of an idea where there is a global world economy where trade is constant and so deficits don't matter because people talk about the UK trade deficit but why group countries together like that you may aswell just group the world deficit/surplus and it wouldnt make a difference. The only problem is it doesn't really show the detail of trade but then again even within a country more growth is seen in london or a few cities compared to rural areas and yet the trade is still grouped, I can't get my head around why the trade deficit is seen as important?? I know I probably sound really stupid but i really want somebody to explain this to me properly
You won't be able to get much of a headstart until you start learning about the essential technicalities in the first few lessons.
If you like, start reading articles from BBC News -> Business. That'll give you a flavour. Particularly articles on the UK economy (for instance, if manufacturing has increased over the past few years) are recommended.
You will be reading up regularly during the year as well (if you're thinking of achieving a good grade, anyway!).
Game theory: in prisoner's dilemma why is it that (don't coorporate, don't cooperate) is the only nash equilibria? What about (cooperate,cooperate) ? Isnt the best response to another prisoner's action to cooperate, cooperate?
Game theory: in prisoner's dilemma why is it that (don't coorporate, don't cooperate) is the only nash equilibria? What about (cooperate,cooperate) ? Isnt the best response to another prisoner's action to cooperate, cooperate?
No - because if the other prisoner cooperates then you're better off not cooperating as the outcome is better for you than if you did cooperate.
Can somebody explain to me the difference between the 'role of a regulator' and the role of competition commission??? Or are they the same thing? Confused!
In this article, it mentions the sale of student loans to private companies in order to "reduce government debt". Being a novice at Economics, I fail to see how this would be beneficial for the private companies. I understand that the government would get money in return for these loans (while the companies would get the loan repayments), but surely there would be no point in buying the loans if the buying price was the same as the total loan repayments? Thanks in advance to anyone who can answer my questions.
In this article, it mentions the sale of student loans to private companies in order to "reduce government debt". Being a novice at Economics, I fail to see how this would be beneficial for the private companies. I understand that the government would get money in return for these loans (while the companies would get the loan repayments), but surely there would be no point in buying the loans if the buying price was the same as the total loan repayments? Thanks in advance to anyone who can answer my questions.
Does it say that the buying price would be the same as the total loan repayments? I would guess it would be significantly less.
Does it say that the buying price would be the same as the total loan repayments? I would guess it would be significantly less.
No it doesn't; I was just speculating. So basically what is happening is that the companies are banking on the fact that most of the students will be able to pay back their loans, so they make a profit on the buying price, right?
No it doesn't; I was just speculating. So basically what is happening is that the companies are banking on the fact that most of the students will be able to pay back their loans, so they make a profit on the buying price, right?
Enough of the students for them to make a profit on the buying price, yes.
Till theory itz clear but now how to derive it through graphical representation im not able to do so.
Also im not able to understand the first order condition and second order condition.
Well - it's been over 3 years since I touched any of these kind of questions but I'll have a go anyway (at the very least some of the logic may be right if not the actual answer):
Sorry for the poor formatting - I haven't used LaTeX in years either and can't remember how to make it look nice (was enough hassle just getting the fractions to work as expected!).
Hope this helps and apologies if it's completely wrong!
Thanks a lot... But can you now provide the graphical representation of same
Also please provide explanation of the solution you have provided....
I'm not sure how to draw graphs on here but you would just plot/sketch the equations and show that the solution is at a maximum.
It's a very standard solution - have you studied using Lagrangian multipliers / partial differentiation to solve utility maximisation problems? It should be explained in your Micro textbook / lecture notes. FOC is first order condition (to find stationary point) and SOC is second order condition (to check that it is a maximum).