Why can't we speak out against Homosexuality without being bombarded?

Living with biological parents is in general, the bed for a child.

you are ridiculous if not completely cruel

just glad i wasn't born at a time it was legal for bobby norcross to have made me in another woman, and then forced me to have had 2 dads

From what I've seen I think it'd improve your sunny disposition to have been raised by a gay couple. However given you think I'm cruel for thinking that children should be able to be brought up in stable loving environments, there isn't much left to discuss really.

I hope you sort your issue out, they seem to have really done a number on you.

Evidence?



There are plenty more which conclude that it is not the father which is needed but the stability that generally comes from having a second partner.

just google, loads come up

There's a lot of people with legitimate views on homosexuality and it's effect on our society.

If you're a straight male you can longer disagree with gay marriage, homosexuality in front of children, ramming homosexuality down our throats on soaps, teaching homosexuality in school you're vilified for having a differing opinion to the new Liberal control freaks.

I should be able to disagree and speak out against unnatural acts, two men cannot have children, anal sex is not normal. It is contrary to human nature. If everybody was gay humans would go instinct eventually.

I'm mainly speaking about gay marriage here, teaching gay stuff in schools, that's mostly what i disagree with, yet you're a bigot and a homophobe if you do

We can label people 'weirdo's' 'freaks' 'losers' on a daily basis, yet if we lable those words to somebody because they choose to date men, which is unnatural as two men are not supposed to be together by nature, it's wrong somehow :/ If a grown man is attracted to children, people are disgusted and everybody wants him in prison, so why can't I find homosexuality the same? (not that i think they should go to prion for being gay)

Biology has no 'intention' nor does it have a 'purpose'. We have been over this before, but clearly your understanding hasn't changed. I'll repeat though, once again, evolution doesn't have a purpose. Evolution is a phenomenon. Its like saying gravity's purpose to keep us on the ground. Or that the sun's purpose is to give light. No. It just happens to be what happens. Evolution is a process that happens without intention or purpose. It is merely something observed.

Whether evolution (or the world in general) has a purpose or not - that doesn't change the fact that the person I quoted didn't use the term ''unnatural'' in the way the opponents of gay marriage and homosexuality use it. When criticizing others, at the very least make sure that you understand their position,not distort and misrepresent it.

Weren't you the one clarify what is meant by unnatural? I rebutted that, so I don't really understand your point here.

If everybody was gay humans would go instinct eventually

The only thing I wanted to clarify was that if you're going to criticize someone's position, make sure that you understand and honestly display their positions. The person I quoted used the term unnatural in a way that the opposition to gay marriage does not. Meaning he/she was addressing a straw-man.

Now, whether their definition of unnatural is right or not is beside the point when it comes to not misrepresenting the other's position.

There's a lot of people with legitimate views on homosexuality and it's effect on our society.

If you're a straight male you can longer disagree with gay marriage, homosexuality in front of children, ramming homosexuality down our throats on soaps, teaching homosexuality in school you're vilified for having a differing opinion to the new Liberal control freaks.

I should be able to disagree and speak out against unnatural acts, two men cannot have children, anal sex is not normal. It is contrary to human nature. If everybody was gay humans would go instinct eventually.

I'm mainly speaking about gay marriage here, teaching gay stuff in schools, that's mostly what i disagree with, yet you're a bigot and a homophobe if you do

We can label people 'weirdo's' 'freaks' 'losers' on a daily basis, yet if we lable those words to somebody because they choose to date men, which is unnatural as two men are not supposed to be together by nature, it's wrong somehow :/ If a grown man is attracted to children, people are disgusted and everybody wants him in prison, so why can't I find homosexuality the same? (not that i think they should go to prion for being gay)

It is not besides the point. If you are using the incorrect meaning of a word it hardly seems to be a case of misrepresentation and rather misunderstanding. Generally if you want to make coherent arguments you should use words the words that mean what you want to say.

If supporters accept homosexuality based on two reasons ("It Is Not Your Business" & "Right To Love"), I assume you lads are open to other sexual preferences as well? I am talking about bestiality, pedophilia, and necrophilia. Ironic. They scowl upon the "sexual orientations" I listed before and have such a saintly smile on homosexuality. The logic you use to accept homosexuality also applies to other "sexual orientations".

And may I ask you why?