The Student Room Group

What do you want to know about Oxford?

Scroll to see replies

Is there anybody at Corpus Christi who can tell me about freshers' accommodation? Interview memory is very faded now haha
Original post by Mike.Ross
Mention that in your personal statement.

For them extra credits.


Brilliant! :tongue:
Reply 5262
Original post by HarryW03
Yes. But filled with the riff raff from the poly up the road


Riff raff? You mean the muggles?
Original post by not you
Are you talking about how about 30% go to another university to do the clinical years? Since I highly doubt Oxford would kick out 30% of the medics they recruited


Perhaps. A friend of my sister is a 2nd year medic, and according to her (the medic) the bottom 30% of people are removed from Oxford after second year exams before they can begin their third.

It is also possible that my sister misunderstood and relayed incorrect information onto me, which is why I ask here because it does seem difficult to believe
Original post by anonlad
Perhaps. A friend of my sister is a 2nd year medic, and according to her (the medic) the bottom 30% of people are removed from Oxford after second year exams before they can begin their third.

It is also possible that my sister misunderstood and relayed incorrect information onto me, which is why I ask here because it does seem difficult to believe


My brother was a medical student in Leicester, and even there the medical school regularly kicked out the bottom 10-30% of the cohort each year.
Original post by anonlad
Perhaps. A friend of my sister is a 2nd year medic, and according to her (the medic) the bottom 30% of people are removed from Oxford after second year exams before they can begin their third.

It is also possible that my sister misunderstood and relayed incorrect information onto me, which is why I ask here because it does seem difficult to believe


I think what they mean is that after 3rd year, 30% of the year group go to one of the London universities to do their 3 clinical years.
Original post by anonlad
Perhaps. A friend of my sister is a 2nd year medic, and according to her (the medic) the bottom 30% of people are removed from Oxford after second year exams before they can begin their third.

It is also possible that my sister misunderstood and relayed incorrect information onto me, which is why I ask here because it does seem difficult to believe


Not a chance that this is right - the completion rate in the 3-year Medicine BA (pre-clinical) is well over 90%, like all of Oxford's courses. My money would be on the 30% referring to the fact that it is after the second year exams that people apply for the clinical stage of the full medical degree, which are years 4-6. The Oxford clinical school doesn't automatically admit everyone that is registered for pre-clinical medicine. People who don't progress to clinical study in Oxford (about 30% is plausible) end up doing clinical study in London - some actively choose it. Cambridge used to be an option but I think they've recently decided to stop participating.
Original post by astro67
Not a chance that this is right - the completion rate in the 3-year Medicine BA (pre-clinical) is well over 90%, like all of Oxford's courses. My money would be on the 30% referring to the fact that it is after the second year exams that people apply for the clinical stage of the full medical degree, which are years 4-6. The Oxford clinical school doesn't automatically admit everyone that is registered for pre-clinical medicine. People who don't progress to clinical study in Oxford (about 30% is plausible) end up doing clinical study in London - some actively choose it. Cambridge used to be an option but I think they've recently decided to stop participating.


Perhaps one should add, the reason why not everyone can do the clinical stage in Oxford is that there aren't enough ill people in Oxford. The John Radcliffe is a district general hospital for a relatively small city with a relatively young population. It isn't a big enough hospital to absorb more clinical med students.

Addenbrookes in Cambridge has the same issue.

The JR and Addenbrookes used to exchange some students with, I think, no net gains either way but Cambridge has called that off.
Original post by anonlad
Perhaps. A friend of my sister is a 2nd year medic, and according to her (the medic) the bottom 30% of people are removed from Oxford after second year exams before they can begin their third.

It is also possible that my sister misunderstood and relayed incorrect information onto me, which is why I ask here because it does seem difficult to believe


As stated - after 3rd year (not second) about 30% do need to study in London. Usually most of these are taken by people who want to study in London and a lot of applicants would view this as an opportunity rather than how you phrase it! By the time 3rd year does come around though, a lot of people want to stay with their friends and each year at least a few are made to leave yes. In my year an unusually low number chose to go to London and about 30% were forced out yes, but that was exceptional. The options are UCL, Imperial, King's, Bart's and St George's. If you opt to go to London you can essentially have your pick - most choose the former two.

Original post by nulli tertius
Perhaps one should add, the reason why not everyone can do the clinical stage in Oxford is that there aren't enough ill people in Oxford. The John Radcliffe is a district general hospital for a relatively small city with a relatively young population. It isn't a big enough hospital to absorb more clinical med students.


Yes, but it is all relative. The student to patient ratio in Oxford is far lower than in, say, the huge med schools in London, not to mention Oxford makes far less use of its attached DGH's (Reading, Stoke Mandeville, Milton Keynes, Swindon and Northampton) than other med schools do theirs.

To illustrate the point, Cambridge just decided that the arrangement with London wasn't working out for them so doubled the size of the clinical school. There will not be any more patients - they're just going to deal with it.

The JR and Addenbrookes used to exchange some students with, I think, no net gains either way but Cambridge has called that off.


It was an influx of students from Cambridge. Someone going from Oxford to Cambridge would have been very exceptional.
(edited 8 years ago)
Could someone please tell me how Oxford balls work? Is it just music + alcohol + fancy dresses? Do people attend those a lot?

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by evazilber57
Could someone please tell me how Oxford balls work? Is it just music + alcohol + fancy dresses? Do people attend those a lot?

Posted from TSR Mobile


A few types of dance floor/music, alcohol, food (either dining or stalls), fancy dresses :yep:

Pretty well attended, most people seem to go to at least one in Trinity Term, then there are a few others which are cheaper and less grand in other terms - eg. The RAG Ball or Yule Ball :smile:

No pressure to go though, plenty of people don't go at all and they can be very expensive.
(edited 8 years ago)
Thank you :smile: will be coming to Oxford this year and was just kinda curious

Posted from TSR Mobile
Just think of it like going to dinner with a few mates and having some drinks afterwards, but paying up front. That way £100 or whatever seems pretty normal.
Original post by TheDefiniteArticle
Just think of it like going to dinner with a few mates and having some drinks afterwards, but paying up front. That way £100 or whatever seems pretty normal.


going into third year, i didn't think i could still be taken aback by things other Oxford students describe as "normal", but there you go
Original post by medbh4805
going into third year, i didn't think i could still be taken aback by things other Oxford students describe as "normal", but there you go


When you're stuffing your face with lobster and have drunk a little too much champagne its hard to not drop a £20 note here and there y'know?
Original post by TheDefiniteArticle
Just think of it like going to dinner with a few mates and having some drinks afterwards, but paying up front. That way £100 or whatever seems pretty normal.


Yeah... for most people at Oxford, the idea of spending £100 on dinner and drinks is not 'pretty normal' by any stretch of the imagination. The last Magdalen Commemoration Ball was over £200, after you take suit/dress hire into account, which is very much closer to "one-off luxury event" than "pretty normal".
Oh dear, might've expressed myself wrong. What I mean by 'pretty normal' is 'something which isn't absurdly extravagant given the frequency with which such events occur'. Obviously it's not the sort of thing you do every day but at the same time it isn't something that only the super-rich can do at Oxford.
Original post by TheDefiniteArticle
Oh dear, might've expressed myself wrong. What I mean by 'pretty normal' is 'something which isn't absurdly extravagant given the frequency with which such events occur'. Obviously it's not the sort of thing you do every day but at the same time it isn't something that only the super-rich can do at Oxford.


yeah I get what you mean, but I do the dinner and drinks thing fairly often during term with my chums (who are picky) and i've never come close to dropping £100 on a single night :dontknow:

paying £100 for a ball ticket then more £££ for clothes etc still doesn't really register as normal to me tbh and i think a lot of students do feel this way though there is a lot of peer pressure wrt balls especially as they are portrayed somehow as an essential part of The Oxford Experience....
(edited 8 years ago)
Original post by evazilber57
Could someone please tell me how Oxford balls work? Is it just music + alcohol + fancy dresses? Do people attend those a lot?

Posted from TSR Mobile


And food! They can also have bumper cars and other fun things.

If you like balls there is a good way to go to a lot of them & do good at the same time: most balls have Casinos run by RAG (Raise And Give, the student union charity fundraiser). If you volunteer to work the ball you work half the night and get the other half free.
Original post by medbh4805
yeah I get what you mean, but I do the dinner and drinks thing fairly often during term with my chums (who are picky) and i've never come close to dropping £100 on a single night :dontknow:

paying £100 for a ball ticket then more £££ for clothes etc still doesn't really register as normal to me tbh and i think a lot of students do feel this way though there is a lot of peer pressure wrt balls especially as they are portrayed somehow as an essential part of The Oxford Experience....


I mean, surely it depends on the occasion? Gotta say, I only went to one ball during my time at Oxford - mostly because of the price - and I'll spend £100 on a night out about once a year, and that'll mostly be going to a nice restaurant. I understand it's a lot of money but I've never met anyone at Oxford living a remotely normal lifestyle (i.e. spending <£100/week normally after rent) who can't afford to splash out once in a while, especially given the existence of bursaries etc. It depends where the rest of your budget goes. If you normally go out 3 times a week at £25/night or something, or spend a lot of money on premium food/clothes/hobbies then yeah, sure, you might be stretching the limits of your finances - but if going to a ball is something which is important to you, I'm pretty sure anyone at Oxford can do it.

I could be wrong, of course - I don't pretend to understand the particular circumstances of people I haven't met.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending