The Student Room Group

Quantum phenomena

(edited 8 years ago)
Reply 1
lambda = h/mv
Reply 2
Original post by Kyx
lambda = h/mv


so i have v=hmvv=\dfrac{h}{mv}
then
v=6.63×1034(9.11×1031×207)×2.9×109v=\dfrac {6.63 \times 10^{-34}}{\left( 9.11 \times 10^{-31} \times 207 \right) \times 2.9 \times 10^{-9}}
v=1200ms1 v=1200ms^{-1}

thanks
(edited 8 years ago)
Reply 3
Original post by thefatone
so i have v=hmvv=\dfrac{h}{mv}
then
v=6.63×1034(9.11×1031×207)×2.9×109v=\dfrac {6.63 \times 10^{-34}}{\left( 9.11 \times 10^{-31} \times 207 \right) \times 2.9 \times 10^{-9}}
v=1200ms1 v=1200ms^{-1}

thanks


np

although it's lambda equals, not v equals
Original post by thefatone
so i have v=hmvv=\dfrac{h}{mv}
then
v=6.63×1034(9.11×1031×207)×2.9×109v=\dfrac {6.63 \times 10^{-34}}{\left( 9.11 \times 10^{-31} \times 207 \right) \times 2.9 \times 10^{-9}}
v=1200ms1 v=1200ms^{-1}

thanks


Or can say velocity is propotional to 1/m, so if m is 207 times as big can multiply velocity in question by 1/207. Same thing just less chance of making an algebraic error, and not dependent on any rounding you might have done earlier
Reply 5
Original post by Kyx
np

although it's lambda equals, not v equals


oops that's supposed to be rearranged

v=hmλv=\dfrac{h}{m\lambda}
Reply 6
Original post by thefatone
oops that's supposed to be rearranged

v=hmλv=\dfrac{h}{m\lambda}


I thought so :smile:

Quick Reply

Latest