The Student Room Group

Maths Question?

If the line y=3 is a tangent to a curve, does the tangent have a gradient of infinity or 0?

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1
Original post by mil88
If the line y=3 is a tangent to a curve, does the tangent have a gradient of infinity or 0?


Zero - the line y=3y=3 is horizontal.
Original post by joostan
Zero - the line y=3y=3 is horizontal.


Would it be different for x=3?
Reply 3
Original post by mil88
If the line y=3 is a tangent to a curve, does the tangent have a gradient of infinity or 0?


Zero, as the y co-ordinates aren't increasing by anything the further you go along.

This maybe relevant to the question you're doing depending on what it is, but if you know that the gradient of a curve at a point (or dy/dx) is zero, what does this mean about the point?
Original post by KaylaB
Zero, as the y co-ordinates aren't increasing by anything the further you go along.

This maybe relevant to the question you're doing depending on what it is, but if you know that the gradient of a curve at a point (or dy/dx) is zero, what does this mean about the point?


Note: I actually meant x=3 :facepalm:

Well if the gradient is 0, then the point is a stationary point (if that's what you're getting at?)
Reply 5
Original post by mil88
Note: I actually meant x=3 :facepalm:

Well if the gradient is 0, then the point is a stationary point (if that's what you're getting at?)


Yeah exactly, and the same principle applies for x=3 don't worry :biggrin:
Original post by KaylaB
Yeah exactly, and the same principle applies for x=3 don't worry :biggrin:


But why isn't it infinity for x=3, because surely the y values are increasing but x values aren't. So if you do, dy/dx: you would get a constant/0, which is infinity isn't?
Reply 7
Original post by mil88
But why isn't it infinity for x=3, because surely the y values are increasing but x values aren't. So if you do, dy/dx: you would get a constant/0, which is infinity isn't?


It just means no matter the y value, x will always be 3

Also, I'm not too sure what you meant in the bit I bolded
Reply 8
Original post by mil88
But why isn't it infinity for x=3, because surely the y values are increasing but x values aren't. So if you do, dy/dx: you would get a constant/0, which is infinity isn't?


there is no change in y/x values to get a dy/dx

it would be 0/constant= 0


(Oops thought you meant for y=3)
(edited 8 years ago)
Original post by KaylaB
It just means no matter the y value, x will always be 3

Also, I'm not too sure what you meant in the bit I bolded


I meant that you will have a constant divided by 0.
All these complicated answers, I'll tell you, it's 69 🎉
Original post by mil88
Would it be different for x=3?


Well here it would be best to say that the gradient is undefined.
It is often convenient to think of this as being infinite, and you won't go too far wrong thinking of it this way.
(edited 8 years ago)
Original post by Dinaa
there is no change in y/x values to get a dy/dx


Well using change in y divided by change in x, there will be a change in y and none in x, hence constant divided by 0 which is infinity isn't it?
Original post by joostan
Well here it would be best to say that the gradient is undefined.


So infinite right?
Original post by mil88
So infinite right?


Check my edit.
Reply 15
Original post by KaylaB
It just means no matter the y value, x will always be 3

Also, I'm not too sure what you meant in the bit I bolded


I think OP is talking about the change in y would be 0 and the change in x= a constant

therefore change in y/change in x= constant/0
Reply 16
Original post by mil88
Well using change in y divided by change in x, there will be a change in y and none in x, hence constant divided by 0 which is infinity isn't it?


yh I edited, thought u mean y=3 :3
Reply 17
Original post by Dinaa
I think OP is talking about the change in y would be 0 and the change in x= a constant

therefore change in y/change in x= constant/0


Ah okay thanks for clearing that up :smile:
Original post by joostan
Check my edit.


Ok thanks then! There was a question which I think required you to 'think' that gradient was infinite.
Original post by Dinaa
yh I edited, thought u mean y=3 :3


Nah don't worry, that's my fault for writing it incorrectly in my initial post. Thanks anyway.

Quick Reply

Latest