With the additional pointlessness of an arbitrary 50 year cutoff - which for the UK lands right in the middle of the 1960s university building boom.
in a couple of years the oldest UK unis under 50 will be oddballs like Buckingham
If Strathclyde could qualify as being under 50 in the 2014 competition despite being founded in 1798, surely the best universities under 50 must include Imperial, Manchester and Cardiff?
If Strathclyde could qualify as being under 50 in the 2014 competition despite being founded in 1798, surely the best universities under 50 must include Imperial, Manchester and Cardiff?
Here's a twist I haven't seen before... UK universities divided into 4 clusters
#1 with 2 members (no prizes for guessing) #2 with 39 members #3 with 67 members #4 with 19 members