Muslim doctor calls killing homosexuals "compassionate"

Are you an atheist?

You don't have to "support" it. Just accept it as a natural part of human behaviour.

So you think that Muhammad (and by extension, Allah) went a bit too far in ordering them to be put to death?

"Educated" how? About what?
What is the "harsh truth?

I come across this quite a lot when quizzing Muslims about their position on the more unplesant aspects of Islamic ideology.
For instance, some are reluctant to outright condemn slavery because they are aware that it is permitted in the Quran, so it would be an act of kufr to condemn something that Allah has permitted.
However, at the same time they are aware that slavery is universally condemned by all civilised people and societies, so they can't come out in support of it - well, apart from those few who hold their deen higher than not beeing seen as medieval barbarians.

Have a guess.

Oh well, that's ok then

Allah ****ing Ackbar

http://metro.co.uk/2016/04/07/isis-throw-gay-man-off-roof-in-new-video-5802636/

It's no coincidence that you're a Christian while having been raised in a Christian household with Christian values. Had you been raised in a Hindu household with Hindu values, you'd be just as sure of Hinduism's truth as you are of Christianity's even though they are completely different worldviews.

This is indoctrination.

I'm grateful for my upbringing
And inshallah ya rab,I hope to raise my kids in a Christian household too

And so perpetuate the cycle of superstitious indoctrination, rather than giving therm a chance of making their own minds up after they have been educated and are old enough not to be affected by your views.

They can choose to do as they wish when they're abit older.

But indoctrinated into your beliefs before that, thus reducing their own free choice in practice.

So you consider Muhammad's (and by extension, Allah's) position on homosexuality to be wrong.
That's very honest and encouraging. If only more Muslims would have the courage to reject those unacceptable parts of the Quran and sunnah. It could see the start of a Christianity-like enlightenment.

I come across this quite a lot when quizzing Muslims about their position on the more unplesant aspects of Islamic ideology.
For instance, some are reluctant to outright condemn slavery because they are aware that it is permitted in the Quran, so it would be an act of kufr to condemn something that Allah has permitted.
However, at the same time they are aware that slavery is universally condemned by all civilised people and societies, so they can't come out in support of it - well, apart from those few who hold their deen higher than not beeing seen as medieval barbarians.

A devout peace-loving, pacifistic Buddhist. Either that or an athiest.

No mate, he's a devil worshipper - like me

And apparently a False Murtad - also like me


Edit: btw, being a Buddhist and an atheist technically aren't mutually exclusive...

Posted from TSR Mobile

Lol. Nowhere in the Qur'an or any Hadith does it say "go and enslave people". Islam actually eradicated many methods of enslavement that people used to practice before. The only enslavement that is permitted in Islam is enslavement through war. Letting people go during these times would have meant a higher risk of them spreading injustice and killing Muslims, as was their aim.

There are also guidelines to dealing with slaves: they must be clothed and fed the same as their masters, and they should be treated with kindness. If his master beats him then he must release his slave. Most slaves actually became part of the family. So technically this isn't "slavery" - they were treated fairly and with the same rights. A slave also had the right to 'buy' himself free from his master.

Think of how maids, butlers and so on are treated by some people nowadays and compare it to how slaves were treated during those times by the Muslims.

I think you need to read more into this subject. It's not as simple as "Islam permits slavery". Your ancestors most likely used to kidnap Africans, beat them, and sell them as a sort of business. This is definitely not permitted in Islam, so please stop going on about how "civilised" non-Muslims are.

[a Hadith Qudsi] “Allaah, may He be exalted, said: ‘There are three whose opponent I will be on the Day of Resurrection, and whomever I oppose, I will defeat … A man who sold a free man and consumed his price.’” Narrated by al-Bukhaari (2227).

There are also guidelines to dealing with slaves: they must be clothed and fed the same as their masters, and they should be treated with kindness. If his master beats him then he must release his slave. Most slaves actually became part of the family. So technically this isn't "slavery" - they were treated fairly and with the same rights. A slave also had the right to 'buy' himself free from his master.

Think of how maids, butlers and so on are treated by some people nowadays and compare it to how slaves were treated during those times by the Muslims.

Wait are you an Arab Christian?