britain first attacked in east london

Text book victim blaming.

Would you provoke a venomous snake if you knew it was going to bite you? Britain First went to that Mosque with the obvious intent to incite violence so that they can demonise the Muslim community.

If this is Britain First's intention and everybody seems so aware of it, why then, upon seeing Britain First, do individuals resort to thuggish behaviour and violence. All they are doing is helping Britain First and giving them legitimacy. As long as people continue to react like this, Britain First will gain more legitimacy and more support and will keep doing publicity acts such as this one.

But an intolerant view of political views.

No matter how provocative there's NO justification for violence

Why can't these Muslims respond in a peaceful way given we are told this is what the quran and islam teaches them?

Or are these muslims using violence (something we are told is wrong) not true muslims?

No matter how provocative there's NO justification for violence

Why can't these Muslims respond in a peaceful way given we are told this is what the quran and islam teaches them?

Or are these muslims using violence (something we are told is wrong) not true muslims?

They weren't the aggressors in this video.

So you agree they were proactive which is the point I was trying to make. And if you had quoted me fully you can see I condemned these actions.

I could say the exact same of you (all) who criticise my tolerant views.

They provoke reaction and say things which they know will get the reaction they want and they film it so morons like you believe it.

Standing in front of a mosque (where suprisingly lots of Muslims will walk by), holding a cross and calling out agressive insults such as "Muslims worship a paedophile" seems pretty provactive to me. The true Christians imo will never react this way. So much for Jesus's "make peace with your enemies". I definitely don't condone the violence from the Muslims but this is obviously what BF wanted.

Because we are humans. When a religious human has his entire family's beliefs, friends' beliefs, philosophical ideas and ways of life insulted by a gang of 20+ skinheads who think you're responsible for terror attacks worldwide, it isn't exactly easy to just ignore them. By natural selection, we are competitors, and violence is instinctive because as competitors, violence and fighting or competing is compulsive for survival. They should have ignored them, the majority did, but its a shame that a few had to react violently. Not only because violence in this case was wrong, but mainly because it gives them what they want and it creates the illusion that all Muslims are violent, when it is likely to be less than 5% of the Muslims present who actually participated in the violent responses.

Have you ever been to a predominantly Muslim country, and gone to the local shops, restaurants, etc?

Yes, so what?


Posted from TSR Mobile

Until these more violent groups can be stopped, this situation is going to continue. This was not a matter of survival. Their lives were not under threat and there was no need to react violently. Their violent reaction however has the ability to challenge their survival though. With the growth of the far right, the last thing that is needed is for groups of Muslims to react violently and provide fodder for far right propaganda. Violent reactions like this are fuelling the far right, and this has the potential to have disastrous effects on the Muslim community in Britain.

If however people carried on with their day, made no fuss and maybe even went out of the way to offer the protesters drinks or food, then their actions would have been far more effective. Britain First would have walked away from the scene with little to no footage to fuel their agenda.

I'm going to ignore the percentage figure you have provided as I don't see how one can say how many individuals were or weren't involved. The main issue at hand here is that those individuals who resorted to violence have done more harm to the British Muslim community than Britain First could ever do.

I'm curious as to why you think that Muslims are violent and violence is 'to be expected' from them.

That's a fair observation.

The issue here though, is that you support violence against people who support ideologies you personally disagree with.



Exactly, they are saying things. Do you think it's fine for police to start using violence against protesters?

Because I am not deaf and blind


Posted from TSR Mobile