The Student Room Group

Simple harmonic motion

Screenshot_2016-04-12-14-36-52.png

I'm struggling with an mcq question here. Could anyone tell me why the maximum velocity is pi m/s? Urgent please. Thanks
Original post by Ridah
Screenshot_2016-04-12-14-36-52.png

I'm struggling with an mcq question here. Could anyone tell me why the maximum velocity is pi m/s? Urgent please. Thanks


They've swapped the labelling for the axes, BTW, but ... the magnitude of the max velocity for SHM is:

vmax=ωA=2πfA=2πATv_{\text{max}} = \omega A = 2\pi f A = \frac{2 \pi A}{T}

so just read the appropriate numbers off the graph, and plug them in.
Reply 2
Original post by Ridah


I'm struggling with an mcq question here. Could anyone tell me why the maximum velocity is pi m/s? Urgent please. Thanks


From the graph x=π2cos2tx=v=πsin2tx = \frac{\pi}{2}\cos 2t \Rightarrow x' = v = -\pi \sin 2t which is maximum precisely when sin2t=1\sin 2t = -1 and v=πms1v = \pi \, \mathrm{ms}^{-1}.
Original post by Zacken
From the graph x=π2cos2tx=v=πsin2tx = \frac{\pi}{2}\cos 2t \Rightarrow x' = v = -\pi \sin 2t which is maximum precisely when sin2t=1\sin 2t = -1 and v=πms1v = \pi \, \mathrm{ms}^{-1}.


Where are you getting these numbers from? They don't look right to me.
Reply 4
Original post by atsruser
Where are you getting these numbers from? They don't look right to me.


What's your AA and TT? I mostly hazarded a guess from the axes, the amplitude looked like π2\frac{\pi}{2} and the period like π\pi - I didn't see your answer before posting mine, whoops.
Reply 5
Original post by Zacken
What's your AA and TT? I mostly hazarded a guess from the axes, the amplitude looked like π2\frac{\pi}{2} and the period like π\pi - I didn't see your answer before posting mine, whoops.


The 'period''s definitely 3m. I'd guess the 'amplitude' is 1.5s
Reply 6
Original post by Alexion
The 'period''s definitely 3m. I'd guess the 'amplitude' is 1.5s


Huh? The axes should be swapped, no?
Reply 7
Original post by Zacken
Huh? The axes should be swapped, no?


Yeah it's real confusing without the rest of the question to make it clearer :/
Original post by Alexion
Yeah it's real confusing without the rest of the question to make it clearer :/


Here is the question paper from what i can see:
Question 1:
Both of the responses here are correct, although i prefer the 2πfA2\pi fA method (because it works all the time every time)
Original post by Zacken
Huh? The axes should be swapped, no?


You don't seem to have done that, as far as I can tell from your numbers. It seems to work out fine if you swap the axes then read off the values. As it stands, the graph doesn't make much sense - time only seems to exist between -2 and +2.
Reply 10
Original post by atsruser
You don't seem to have done that, as far as I can tell from your numbers. It seems to work out fine if you swap the axes then read off the values. As it stands, the graph doesn't make much sense - time only seems to exist between -2 and +2.


I assumed it was a typo on the question setters part and mentally swapped the labels on the axes.
Original post by Zacken
I assumed it was a typo on the question setters part and mentally swapped the labels on the axes.


Err, yeah, but your numbers don't seem right though. T= 3 s, and A= 1.5 m, no?
Reply 12
Original post by atsruser
Err, yeah, but your numbers don't seem right though. T= 3 s, and A= 1.5 m, no?


Right... I'll need to get myself declared legally blind.
Reply 13
Thank you so much.

Quick Reply

Latest