Women don't come close to men in most facets of life. Unless it has something to do with childbearing, men are vastly more competent at nearly everything else. For starters, men are far more physically stronger. Quadruple that with their better intelligence, dexterity and vitality, they tend to build and innovate more than any woman could hope (except for maybe one or two).
With their natural abilities, men create and maintain civilisation. To see this in action, all you need to do is to look at the workforce. All the important work that keeps this country afloat is done by men day in day out. From domestic construction to industrial construction. From electricians, plumbers and mechanics to the Royal Marines and the postal/delivery service. Without men you wouldn't have grand buildings, paved roads, sturdy bridges, marvellous aeroplanes and amazing automobiles and comfortable communication. Hell, have you ever seen a woman change a tire? I haven't and it isn't a particularly difficult thing to do. Either they don't care to learn or they simply aren't capable, despite lots of women owning cars. What sort of work do women do? Nursing, teaching, office work, babysitting, domestic work and a few others. Yes these are important, but a country can survive without this sort of work, whereas a country would fall into disrepair and destruction very quickly if all trade work, construction work and policing stopped for whatever reason.
Man's superiority isn't limited to work. In the field of study, again you see men dominate. Men have been the important philosophers, scientists, mathematicians, astronomers and writers. There aren't many (if any) female equivalents of Aristotle, Averroes, Aurelius, Ibn al-Rawandi, Isaac Newton, Cyrus, Washington, Isambard Brunel...and so on and so forth. Naturally because of their higher intelligence, men are the de facto leaders of any country. Most politicians are men and most countries historically were ruled by kings and their armies. Speaking of armies, no country would be able to defend itself without men, because only men have the strength, endurance and build required of a soldier. And only men have the industrious talent needed to develop lethal firearms, explosives and heavy weapons. No woman would have been able to write The Prince - the best book on realpolitik that I have read. Why? Because men are practical and rational creatures and therefore acknowledge what must be done in any given society - they know the threat of war always looms and defence is an essential aspect of any competent country. Machiavelli was definitely that sort of person even if his suggestions were brutal but he was a realist. Again reinforcing how men are natural leaders. They have the instinct to get sh*t done. On the other hand, women are often irrational and pander to emotion.
So what else? Well there's sports. Every sport has been mastered by men and I'm sure most if not all were invented by them. When people go to watch a game of football or cricket, they watch the pinnacle of the game, since you're paying to watch something and therefore you want to see the best. In women's tennis, the Williams sisters, the best female tennis players in the world, got pounded by a chain-smoking, binge-drinking Karsten Braasch who was ranked 203 when it happened in 1998. Every grandmaster is a man, except for Judit Polgar and maybe a couple other token women. Every snooker champion is a man. Every golf champion is a man. Thats because being being a grandmaster requires exceptional intelligence and mental stamina. Snooker and gold require exceptional dexterity, endurance and strength. Women don't have these qualities except in exceptional cases.
So we can put women's superiority to a rest now. But men and women are still equal right? Nope, not even a bit.