The Student Room Group
Uni students - Complete our survey >>
Uni students - Complete our survey >>
Uni students - Complete our survey >>

Court stops circumcision.

Scroll to see replies

Reply 200
Avatar for Josb
Josb
6
Original post by Youngmetro
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/active/mens-health/10998633/Dont-compare-male-circumcision-with-FGM.html

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/why-female-genital-mutilation-very-different-issue-male-circumcision-1486805

Two things, first is that your comparing the two is invalid. Refer to the two articles plus the 100 other ones that say it isnt a valid comparison to make.

Second, a circumcised vagina aint even aesthetically pleasing.


I precisely didn't compare circumcision with FGM - removal of the clitoris. I compared it with the removal of inner labia - called nymphoplasty.

Original post by Josb
Yeah, I think we should do the same to girls, because vaginas are more aesthetically pleasing when the inner labia don't stick outside.


Learn to read. :bootyshake:
Original post by Josb
I precisely didn't compare circumcision with FGM - removal of the clitoris. I compared it with the removal of inner labia - called nymphoplasty.



Learn to read. :bootyshake:


Glad there are sane people on the site
Original post by cherryred90s
What a comparison :laugh:


I know. :smile:
Original post by AperfectBalance
Ok so if a majority of people think something is right it is?

I assume you think that gays should be stoned or people who leave the faith should be killed? Since more Muslims think this than not


Im not a muslim.

Stop making vague comments like that. I've already justified with good reason why it is right, reply to that first before suggesting it is unjustified.
Original post by Youngmetro
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/active/mens-health/10998633/Dont-compare-male-circumcision-with-FGM.html

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/why-female-genital-mutilation-very-different-issue-male-circumcision-1486805

Two things, first is that you comparing the two is invalid. Refer to the two articles plus the 100 other ones that say it isnt a valid comparison to make.

Second, a circumcised vagina aint even aesthetically pleasing.


you like labia/ big labia?
Reply 205
Avatar for Josb
Josb
6
Original post by queen-bee
female general mutilation is disgusting and used to oppress and abuse women so they can't enjoy sex,how are you comparing it to male circumcision?


Male circumcision developed to prevent boys from masturbating. I'd say it's perfectly sensible to compare it to FGM.
Original post by Josb
I precisely didn't compare circumcision with FGM - removal of the clitoris. I compared it with the removal of inner labia - called nymphoplasty.



Learn to read. :bootyshake:


It isnt done for religious reason, only for practical purposes. Its also very rare too.

Hence, it is still invalid.
Original post by Youngmetro
Im not a muslim.

Stop making vague comments like that. I've already justified with good reason why it is right, reply to that first before suggesting it is unjustified.


Ok so for cleanliness It hardly improves it, I mean in these modern days Most people wash regularly, in countries like America and Uk.
Stds. we have condoms, and even without the benefits are negligible Look at the nhs studies and others.

Never said you were a Muslim, but by your logic you agree that it is ok for them to do that
Original post by AperfectBalance
Ok so for cleanliness It hardly improves it, I mean in these modern days Most people wash regularly, in countries like America and Uk.
Stds. we have condoms, and even without the benefits are negligible Look at the nhs studies and others.

Never said you were a Muslim, but by your logic you agree that it is ok for them to do that


It does cause complications, search it for yourself. It still holds the risk of disease etc etc. On that basis, it is still more practical. Therefore when an adult makes the decision on that premise then it is perfectly fine and justified.

STDs, well if everyone wore condoms then the world would be a lovely place free of STDs. And, not all STDs can be prevented by a condom anyway.

I use this logic specifically to this scenario. Besides such a comparison is invalid and fallacious.
Original post by alkaline.
you like labia/ big labia?


I didnt think it was labia he was talking about.
Original post by Youngmetro
It does cause complications, search it for yourself. It still holds the risk of disease etc etc. On that basis, it is still more practical. Therefore when an adult makes the decision on that premise then it is perfectly fine and justified.

STDs, well if everyone wore condoms then the world would be a lovely place free of STDs. And, not all STDs can be prevented by a condom anyway.

I use this logic specifically to this scenario. Besides such a comparison is invalid and fallacious.


It is very uncommon to get a disease due to your foreskin, all it takes is basic hygiene, Everything holds a risk but this is not justified as to cutting of foreskin.
Not all stds can be prevented by circumcision,and in no way is circumcision much of a benefit against stds
Original post by TSRUsername99
In my experience it was more than a little, not enough to make sex a struggle but enough to make it less pleasurable, especially blowjobs.
That's down to the person giving - and receiving. Again, I've never had any problems there, though when it's happened I've stopped it after a short time, the idea of it doesn't do anything for me. If you get me.
Original post by Youngmetro
It does cause complications, search it for yourself. It still holds the risk of disease etc etc. On that basis, it is still more practical. Therefore when an adult makes the decision on that premise then it is perfectly fine and justified.

STDs, well if everyone wore condoms then the world would be a lovely place free of STDs. And, not all STDs can be prevented by a condom anyway.

I use this logic specifically to this scenario. Besides such a comparison is invalid and fallacious.


Search Botched circumcision or something like that, If you want to
Original post by Aspiringhigh
i got circumcised as a baby and despite being the least religious person ever im insanely grateful my parents did it because foreskins are gross and unhygienic :/
pornstar dick ftw


Foreskins are neither gross nor unhygienic.
Original post by AperfectBalance
It is very uncommon to get a disease due to your foreskin, all it takes is basic hygiene, Everything holds a risk but this is not justified as to cutting of foreskin.
Not all stds can be prevented by circumcision,and in no way is circumcision much of a benefit against stds


The premise for circumcision is still there, circumcision reduces chances of certain diseases, same with STDs, the chance is reduced.
Original post by Youngmetro
The premise for circumcision is still there, circumcision reduces chances of certain diseases, same with STDs, the chance is reduced.


Negligibly. it is pretty vile to chop someones skin of without their permission
Original post by AperfectBalance
Search Botched circumcision or something like that, If you want to


It doesnt seem like there's much chance of this in Britain. Sure, the procedure can go wrong, just like a pregnancy.
Original post by AperfectBalance
Negligibly. it is pretty vile to chop someones skin of without their permission


No, it isnt negligible.
Original post by AperfectBalance
Search Botched circumcision or something like that, If you want to


*googles botched circumcision*

this appears

Spoiler

(edited 8 years ago)
Original post by Youngmetro
Second, a circumcised vagina aint even aesthetically pleasing.


This is a nonsensical justification because attraction is totally subjective. Some people will prefer the look of circumcised dicks and others will hate how they look.

The subjectivity of what one perceives to be beautiful is not a valid reason for cutting off a part of a someone's body that will never grow back, especially when said person cannot understand the implications involved and consent.

Quick Reply

Related discussions

Latest

Trending

Trending

Articles for you