It wasnt that long ago that local authorities i,e councils had responsibility for social housing. They built and operated what are commonly known as council estates. The general perception and often the reality was that these homes were inhabited by the poorer members of what passes for society ranging from the unemployed, unemployable, single mothers ,low paid etc.
Meanwhile people who were working in good jobs lived in private housing and had a mortgage.
This was a form of segregation but everyone knew their place and it was the accepted norm.
Over the years the line has blurred. Councils no longer run housing. They are all operated by stand alone companies. Fewer and fewer such properties are built and in many areas they are now scarce.
A Labour government decided to conduct social experiments. They acquired vast tracts of land under the corrupt pathfinder scheme and sold them off cheaply to developers. The condition of the deal was that as well as private housing, they would also have to build social (council) housing.
So now the dolehopper can live on the same development as the hard working mortgage payer.
Does that seem fair and does it encourage aspiration?