E.U Leave or Remain: limiting E.U migration to the U.K

Ofc it could affect migration, because we would have control of policy. We wouldnt have to defer to the EU but could decide on our own immigration policies in particular with respect to how we deal with people from the EU, where 80% of migration comes There is ofc a flipside whicch means others in the EY will treat people from the UK accordingly..

No free trade without free movement

No free trade without free movement

Do you have statistics to support your claim that migrants are more likely to work than Britains? Please support such a bold claim with evidence.

Population IS a national problem, England is the most densley populated country in Europe. Hence the housing crisis, strain on the NHS and reduction of green belt land. In what way will remaining in the EU give us a better position to tackle these problems?

England isn't a country. The UK is.

The strain on the NHS is directly as a result of underinvestment despite an increasing elderly population.

Housing prices are going up because Houses are not being built with the lowest number of houses since WW2.

England is a country, fact.

Yes, houses are not being built at a high enough rate to meet demand, but what is driving the demand??

Mass immigration into the UK is driving the housing crisis. Here are the facts. Net migration into to the UK was 323,000 last year, per government reports. Houses in britain are being built at a rate of approximately 150,000 depending on the year. This is creating a squeeze on the housing shortage facing Britains. ?

Yes, there are other contributors such as foreign investement/holiday homes, but these are contained to a limited number of houses in exclusive areas of the country. Should we build and build and build until there are no more farms to grow crops to feed our country?

I agree, the housing crisis has more than one contributing factor, but one factor is contributing vastly more than others.

'Just build more houses'. Where? Shall we encroach more and more into greenbelt land? This would result in more floods, more harmful chemicals in the environment. Less land to grow crops to feed a rising population.

'Well, Farming is heavily subsidised by the EU. If you want to leave the EU, then no farming'

I'm not debating about the economics behind farming, I'm asking where will the increased land needed to feed an increased population come from if the greenbelt land previously available has now been built on.

No EU, no farming? How do you think we coped before the EU?

Do you have statistics to support your claim that migrants are more likely to work than Britains? Please support such a bold claim with evidence.

Population IS a national problem, England is the most densley populated country in Europe. Hence the housing crisis, strain on the NHS and reduction of green belt land. In what way will remaining in the EU give us a better position to tackle these problems?

Plenty of brownbelt land.
How does one grow crops on brownbelt land?]

Is it actually that valuable? No.
If growing food, preventing environmental disasters such as flooding and limiting harmful toxins in our air that are killing people aren't important then I question a person's priorities. ]

Talking about houses
At the moment Brownfield sites in the UK have the potential to support the building of 976,000. At current rates this will provide for nearly 8 years worth of building, but only 3.5 years worth of building at a rate the government judge is needed to meet demand. What about after these 4-8 years?
http://www.cpre.org.uk/resources/housing-and-planning/housing/item/3785-from-wasted-space-to-living-spaces.

Sorry but building in the middle of the country isn't going to lead to flooding.
Yes it will. If you build on a flood plain, or deforest an area to build houses, there is less space for floodwater to drain and less trees to soak up said water.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/bfa49cb0-acbf-11e5-b955-1a1d298b6250.html#axzz46T8P8HvC].

What reason is that? Genuine question.

Build on Greenfield. Plenty of land around cities that is not being used at all.
This debate has come full circle and so doesn't seem productive. You say build on greenbelt land, I propose why it is unwise to do so. You say build on brownfield land, I say this will last a few years, but what then? You say build on greenbelt land.]