Should european women dress modestly to accommodate other cultures?

Also, why are you focusing on the West? Christian "terrorism" happens probably daily in Eastern countries, usually against Muslims. The burning of mosques, attacks against Muslims etc. (which also happens very often in the West).

But why is the West more important when it comes to terrorism?

Do you agree European women should change how they dress to accommodate other cultures?

Yeah, you just proved the point. The KKK was a Christian organisation. There was a large religious (Catholic vs Protestant) element to the Irish Troubles, which was pretty much a civil war. It wasn't that long ago that Christian terrorists were regularly bombing abortion clinics all over the place.

Here's a list of some of the worst, most recent ones. http://www.alternet.org/tea-party-and-right/10-worst-terror-attacks-extreme-christians-and-far-right-white-men

But yes, you just demonstrated the point perfectly. Christian terrorists do occur, they're just not reported to the same extent, and rarely actually associated with Christianity.

Think you need to do more research. They are/were a Protestant-led organisation, and base some of their beliefs on Protestant ideas, not to mention they were extremely anti-Catholic and targeted many Catholics and Jews. They also believed Jesus was the first "klansman", and would pray/sing hymns as they carried out cross burnings. And there are some who believe there is Biblical evidence for what they're doing.Funny how Christian terrorists aren't given as much attention/criticism by the media. Apparently the "terrorist" label only applies to Muslims nowadays.

It's one thing saying women should not bow to pressure from minority cultures, it's another thing to say that they should be reckless with their own safety for no good reason.

They were established to promote white supremacy and to retain the major plantation owners influence during the reconstruction of the South after the Civil War. The majority of Southerners were, and are, Christians so they are likely do display Christian behaviour, but the KKK did not attempt to impose a Christian theocracy based on a literalist interpretation of the Bible. Their policies were based on ideas of racial purity and supremacy, and political power, not on the imposition of "god's will".

If you paid any attention to mainstream media, you would notice that every Christian terrorist attack is reported. However, as these are almost exclusively small-scale attacks on abortion providers, they are not as newsworthy as 150 people being machinegunned at a gig or cafe, or blowing up trains, or planes flown into buildings, or bombs in airports.

Remember that the media are under no obligation to give equal weight to every event worldwide. The unique and catastrophic is far more newsworthy than the everyday and inconvenient.

Ah, I see what the problem is now. You are confusing "Christian terrorism", with "Terrorists who are Christians".

They are not the same thing. A terrorist attack in support of white supremacist ideology is "white supremacist" terrorism, regardless of the faith, or lack of it, of the perpetrator.

The murder of an unfaithful partner carried out by an accountant is not an "Accountancy murder", it is a "Crime of passion".

And some of the terrorists in that list aren't even Christians! But they were all widely reported in the media.
So I'm really not sure what your point is.

Lol I could say the same whenever someone talks about Muslim terrorists. They're terrorists who just happen to be Muslims

So wearing a short skirt or tight dress is "being reckless with their safety"?
Is wearing a bikini on a beach or by a pool "reckless"? Why are naturist camps not awash with rapes?

The fact that they have to reach back to the Klan, which really only existed formally and substantively in the 1870s and again in the early-mid 20th century, to try to elevate Christian terror to the same status as Islamic terror, speaks volumes about the emptiness of their arguments.

These kind of Christian freaks are a minority.

How do you know every single one is reported? Answer is, you can't know.

Lol I could say the same whenever someone talks about Muslim terrorists. They're terrorists who just happen to be Muslims

The KKK was not a "Christian" organisation, it was political. Most of its members may have been Christians, but that doesn't make it "Christian" any more than The Playboy Club, or the American Marketing Association are "Christian organisations".

The KKK was not a "Christian" organisation, it was political. Most of its members may have been Christians, but that doesn't make it "Christian" any more than The Playboy Club, or the American Marketing Association are "Christian organisations".

I never said any of those things were true. What I said was that encouraging anyone, male or female, to ignore reasonable safety precautions on the basis of a nonsensical principle is both irresponsible and irrelevant to the issue of this thread.

To be fair (and controversial), and to digress from the actual point: Christians like to give credit to the Church for "good things" (e.g. magna carta) that was mainly the result of political and other ideological influences (not theological), so in this respect, if the Church takes the credit for some things, it must also take the blame for others

Lol I could say the same whenever someone talks about Muslim terrorists. They're terrorists who just happen to be Muslims

I was thinking about this while watching MotD this weekend.
Why don't the players who hold up their hands in thanks to god when they score, shake their fists at the sky when they miss?