The Student Room Group

Sadiq Khan looks set to be UK's most powerful Muslim

Scroll to see replies

Original post by Josb
Is he really Muslim?


Yes
Some of the pre election comments by Tories really do make you laugh:
Theresa may said he wasn't suitable to protect London because he'd been a human rights lawyer...
Original post by hazzer1998
Stop you anti tory rhetoric ... Yes Khan looks sets to win however that doesn't mean he will be the Most powerful Muslim in the UK FFS


I agree!
Reply 43
Original post by KaminiZindagi
Yes


Practicing?
Reply 44
Original post by Bornblue
Some of the pre election comments by Tories really do make you laugh:
Theresa may said he wasn't suitable to protect London because he'd been a human rights lawyer...


The Tories have made a terrible campaign and chosen a terrible candidate.
Original post by Josb
Practicing?


Dont know. Ask him. But he is Muslim
Original post by Josb
The Tories have made a terrible campaign and chosen a terrible candidate.


Indeed. I'd always thought Zak was a bit of a maverick who held his own opinions. But he's been deservedly punished for a negative, dog whistling campaign.
Original post by gr8wizard10
so if terrorist bombers were to fly around the union jack, we should automatically change flags...

tsr needs a min age restriction for all these stupid remarks you people make

edl waved around the english flag, doesn't mean it constitues the belief of the majority of the people the flag represents


ffs a muslim can't just flag the ****ing al qaida flag at a muslim conference. are you ****ing serious? I don't care what the slogan says - that's al qaida's symbol. socialists don't fly the red flag these days because of the ****ing communists (as they shouldn't), germans don't use many of their national symbols based on how the nazis used them, buddhists similarly can't use the swastika anymore. even people in england don't fly the english flag because they keep being accused of being racists based on the associations. you can't just suggest that the al qaeda flag is somehow politically neutral! it's not
(edited 7 years ago)
He'll bring in Sharia law, all women of all colours to be given burkhas to wear & banning clubs, pubs, bars etc in London

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by SMEGGGY
He'll bring in Sharia law, all women of all colours to be given burkhas to wear & banning clubs, pubs, bars etc in London

Posted from TSR Mobile


grow another brain cell
oh my god, this thread…
Original post by BubbleBoobies
ffs a muslim can't just flag the ****ing al qaida flag at a muslim conference. are you ****ing serious? I don't care what the slogan says - that's al qaida's symbol. socialists don't fly the red flag these days because of the ****ing communists (as they shouldn't), germans don't use many of their national symbols based on how the nazis used them, buddhists similarly can't use the swastika anymore. even people in england don't fly the english flag because they keep being accused of being racists based on the associations. you can't just suggest that the al qaeda flag is somehow politically neutral! it's not


britain invaded how many countries? should the british flag not be flown anywhere? logic/10

recommended: delete your account until you turn 13
Original post by oShahpo
I have no idea how those people are let to roam, its essentially a different kind of Swastika. However, I wouldn't blame it on the man. Did he say anything that might have lead to an incite of terrorism? I doubt it.


If Goldsmith had spoken at a rally with KKK banners being waved, Labour and the SJW's would be preaching about it.
Original post by gr8wizard10
britain invaded how many countries? should the british flag not be flown anywhere? logic/10

recommended: delete your account until you turn 13


britain isn't a dictatorship, britain is a democracy that is a symbol of rights, justice and equality of individuals. britain doesn't stand for colonialism anymore - does it. so why would you say this when al qaeda DOES stand for terrorism today, you absolute ****ing mong? maybe we'll need to check up on al qaeda in 300 years time to see if they've turned into a movement of freedom loving, women-respecting democrats, but until then, you're a total numbskull who needs to learn how to argue better, i.e. not resorting to these childish ad hominems at the end, as if that makes you sound better - it makes you sound *actively* worse. what kind of intelligent person argues in that way?
zac is just a ****, thats why
Original post by Bornblue
Yeah. I heard he once was in the same tesco supermarket at the same time as someone who said they support Isis.
If that isn't enough to convince you that Sadiq Khan is a terrorist lover then I don't know what is.

I love this
Original post by SMEGGGY
He'll bring in Sharia law, all women of all colours to be given burkhas to wear & banning clubs, pubs, bars etc in London

Posted from TSR Mobile


And when that doesn't happen (not that it could, the mayor of London does not have the power to impose laws governing how people dress last I checked) will all of you Eurabia people crawl back under your rocks and stop coming out with your drivel?
Reply 58
London fell long ago, only look at 90% of it, it's a third world dump rife with crime and extremism. The only part satisfiable is the centre and even there it's a **** hole in some parts. It's fit for someone like Sadiq Khan
Original post by BubbleBoobies
britain isn't a dictatorship, britain is a democracy that is a symbol of rights, justice and equality of individuals. britain doesn't stand for colonialism anymore - does it. so why would you say this when al qaeda DOES stand for terrorism today, you absolute ****ing mong? maybe we'll need to check up on al qaeda in 300 years time to see if they've turned into a movement of freedom loving, women-respecting democrats, but until then, you're a total numbskull who needs to learn how to argue better, i.e. not resorting to these childish ad hominems at the end, as if that makes you sound better - it makes you sound *actively* worse. what kind of intelligent person argues in that way?


No offence, but maybe you should try a less aggressive approach by totally changing your writing style. It is hard to read and seems too militant. :redface:

Quick Reply

Latest