The Student Room Group

Your degree and your career aspirations - how do they match up?

Scroll to see replies

Original post by Cobalt_
One of the best attitudes ive seen on TSR regarding careers.


Thanks :smile:
Original post by cherryred90s
Someone already corrected her :smile:


Thank you, was just an error I made. Good luck to everybody :smile:
I studied Psychology with the initial intention to go into Clinical Psychology, although if it were not for my mental health history and personality I would have become a police officer without a second thought.

After undergrad I did my MSc in Sport & Exercise Psychology, because I love love love it, I love sport and physical activity, I love psychology, and I wanted to go into research as a career.

And then I graduated in October 2015 and have ended up as a Social Researcher on the Civil Service Fast Stream. Not something I ever even considered myself doing, not something I thought I would have any interest in whatsoever, and not a department that I would ever have seen myself enjoying. And I absolutely love it. My line manager wanted me on his team because of my background in Psychology, because I am on a team looking at behaviour change in the section of the department I work on, so my degree is what got me here, I am getting to do social research and apply psychology and analytical skills to actually have an effect in policy and decision-making, I am getting to go to conferences and seminars, listen to and learn from amazing people and, I am just loving it. So whilst it was not my plan for my degree, I went into it with an open mind, my degree is why they gave me this role, and I am so happy with how things worked out. :smile:
Degree: Computer Science

Job/Career: Start off as a software developer and the end goal would be chief software architect - I want a position with overview of projects etc doing something I really enjoy, that is developing software for commercial use, and also I have seen chief software architects getting paid slightly over $200k a year (this is by no means a realistic goal its just what I really want to do)

Expected Starting Salary: £20-£30k (for Junior Software Developers - quickly rises up to $51-$70k for software developers after 1-3 years)
Original post by And what
Degree: Computer Science

Job/Career: Start off as a software developer and the end goal would be chief software architect - I want a position with overview of projects etc doing something I really enjoy, that is developing software for commercial use, and also I have seen chief software architects getting paid slightly over $200k a year (this is by no means a realistic goal its just what I really want to do)

Expected Starting Salary: £20-£30k (for Junior Software Developers - quickly rises up to $51-$70k for software developers after 1-3 years)


6 figures is well within reach with experience if you go freelance.

There's plenty of Senior Development roles advertised for £300-£600 per day depending on location.
Original post by JamesN88
6 figures is well within reach with experience if you go freelance.

There's plenty of Senior Development roles advertised for £300-£600 per day depending on location.


Yeah I wouldn't mind going freelance doing contracts with companies, but I'll need reputation and experience I suppose but I want that feel of being part of a company and going for promotions first before thinking about building wealth.

Please note that wanting to be wealthy is completely different to wanting to be rich.
Degree: Hopefully Dietetics
Jobs/Careers of Interest:biggrin:ietitian
Graduate Salary Expected:£21,00-£25,000, after experience/ specialism can be £25,000 +
Original post by BizzStrut
If you watch the debate, you'll find the very first statement he makes is "I'm assuming nobody here just wants to make a lot of money, because then you'd go to Goldman. This is a debate for idealistic students."

Please go elsewhere with your shaming rhetoric. I care. I just know that I am very well suited to corporate work environments and I know I can make a hell of a difference if I succeed there. More than anywhere else.

It might make you feel warm and fuzzy pulling a splinter out of a kid's finger or building a house in Africa for a single family but every large scale project worth doing needs finance and I can support those things that actually matter, instead of piling into field that is already overly saturated with applicants (like medicine) and people who are in it because they want society to think they're kind, considerate and decent people.

I'll have to carry the judgement of people like you for my whole career and it's silly because it's unjust.


I have met many of these kinds of people. "Oh no, I don't go into banking for the money, I do it for the excitement". Which may actually be true, gambling is exciting isn't it? But the "make a difference" is new. What exactly do you think you can make a difference on?
Degree: Software Engineering BEng
Jobs/Careers of Interest: Software Engineer
Graduate Salary Expected: £21 600
Original post by inhuman
I have met many of these kinds of people. "Oh no, I don't go into banking for the money, I do it for the excitement". Which may actually be true, gambling is exciting isn't it? But the "make a difference" is new. What exactly do you think you can make a difference on?


I think I explained earlier in the thread but I'll hash it out once more using medicine as a placeholder for 'traditionally altruistic career' and banking as 'high paying career':

The theory is that traditionally 'altruistic' fields like medicine have an abundance of good hearted people ready to go into the career. If I go there as an altruist, wanting to help people, I wouldn't be making a difference, compared to if I hadn't gone into the field, since there are 50 other wannabe doctors who'd fill my shoes and do a good job.

Further, a doctor's impact isn't scalable. They can only treat so many patients a day with the time they have. Like any business, model, when time is the constraint it's not particularly effective. Research and policy are other areas of medicine that are interesting in this regard but not being a 'doctor', per se.

Next, we have the issue of whether a doctor actually has a big impact. The average doctor doesn't actually save many lives over their career. We might think about surgeons and ER doctors saving hundreds of people a month but the reality is much less. In fact, a £10000 donation to an organisation giving medical aid like vaccines in developing countries saves more lives than a whole career as an average doctor.

Just like with medicine (I would not be missed if I didn't become a doctor) also with Banking there are a line of people who'd snatch at the opportunity to do so. In this instance, though, the line is generally people greedy, self-centred people (insofar as the reasons they're going into it). So if the industry is damaging, my boycotting it based on ideal alone is juvenile and futile. However, if I go into banking and can stomach the potential things I'd be involved in, going into finance and using an non-insignificant amount of my compensation to fund the areas I find compelling (like those mentioned above), I can have not only a much bigger positive social impact than I would in medicine but 'close the gate' to somebody who wouldn't help in finance and also 'open the gate' to one more altruist who wants to be a doctor. Therefore, there's a net positive effect.

Also, banking looks great. High pressure, high risk, high reward. I like the sound of it. My reasons aren't absolutely altruistic. I'm not going to be living on £50000 a year for the rest of my career. But if you have even an inkling of altruism in you then the answer to fulfilling it is a counter-intuitive 'follow the money and put it where it needs to be' (high demand low attention) which is definitely not what medicine is, as we can see by the high competition.
(edited 7 years ago)
Original post by BizzStrut
I think I explained earlier in the thread but I'll hash it out once more using medicine as a placeholder for 'traditionally altruistic career' and banking as 'high paying career':

The theory is that traditionally 'altruistic' fields like medicine have an abundance of good hearted people ready to go into the career. If I go there as an altruist, wanting to help people, I wouldn't be making a difference, compared to if I hadn't gone into the field, since there are 50 other wannabe doctors who'd fill my shoes and do a good job.

Further, a doctor's impact isn't scalable. They can only treat so many patients a day with the time they have. Like any business, model, when time is the constraint it's not particularly effective. Research and policy are other areas of medicine that are interesting in this regard but not being a 'doctor', per se.

Next, we have the issue of whether a doctor actually has a big impact. The average doctor doesn't actually save many lives over their career. We might think about surgeons and ER doctors saving hundreds of people a month but the reality is much less. In fact, a £10000 donation to an organisation giving medical aid like vaccines in developing countries saves more lives than a whole career as an average doctor.

Just like with medicine (I would not be missed if I didn't become a doctor) also with Banking there are a line of people who'd snatch at the opportunity to do so. In this instance, though, the line is generally people greedy, self-centred people (insofar as the reasons they're going into it). So if the industry is damaging, my boycotting it based on ideal alone is juvenile and futile. However, if I go into banking and can stomach the potential things I'd be involved in, going into finance and using an non-insignificant amount of my compensation to fund the areas I find compelling (like those mentioned above), I can have not only a much bigger positive social impact than I would in medicine but 'close the gate' to somebody who wouldn't help in finance and also 'open the gate' to one more altruist who wants to be a doctor. Therefore, there's a net positive effect.

Also, banking looks great. High pressure, high risk, high reward. I like the sound of it. My reasons aren't absolutely altruistic. I'm not going to be living on £50000 a year for the rest of my career. But if you have even an inkling of altruism in you then the answer to fulfilling it is a counter-intuitive 'follow the money and put it where it needs to be' (high demand low attention) which is definitely not what medicine is, as we can see by the high competition.


Oh you, sacrifice yourself for us, will you.

Sorry, probably quite rude, you bothered to write out that long an argument, deserves a better answer, but honestly right now I can't be bothered to reply in detail. Maybe later.
(edited 7 years ago)
Original post by inhuman
Oh you, sacrifice yourself for us, will you.


Why do people do that?

I didn't say that I'm benevolent. I'm not.
But if you want to make the biggest difference possible it is rational. This is essentially a thought experiment. Truthfully, like I said in the last paragraph, it's not like I'm doing it just to make a difference lol. I want to have a good life and work that seems interesting.

Find a flaw in my argument, instead of resorting to what is essentially an ad hominem.
(edited 7 years ago)
Original post by BizzStrut
Why do people do that?

I didn't say that I'm benevolent. I'm not.
But if you want to make the biggest difference possible it is rational. This is essentially a thought experiment. Truthfully, like I said in the last paragraph, it's not like I'm doing it just to make a difference lol. I want to have a good life and work that seems interesting.

Find a flaw in my argument, instead of resorting to what is essentially an ad hominem.



I did edit my post to acknowledge that that was an unfair, silly reply.
I think I'm just going to apply for Google Mountain View as a software engineer for every year during postgrad uni and if I get in then just ditch the postgrad degree and go for that sweet $105k a year package.
Original post by And what
I think I'm just going to apply for Google Mountain View as a software engineer for every year during postgrad uni and if I get in then just ditch the postgrad degree and go for that sweet $105k a year package.


There are other bay area tech companies, not just Google. :') I've seen a lot of people start off in a non-US office, then transfer over to SV. Think the visa process is easier than applying straight.

Did you know they have a Tokyo dev office? You don't even need to know Japanese :tongue:

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by Princepieman
There are other bay area tech companies, not just Google. :':wink: I've seen a lot of people start off in a non-US office, then transfer over to SV. Think the visa process is easier than applying straight.

Did you know they have a Tokyo dev office? You don't even need to know Japanese :tongue:

Posted from TSR Mobile


I see you post on literally all of the computer science boards, you seem really clued up on the stuff I am actually interested in.

The big packages, idgaf about all the other guys on here who have this "urghh its a 1 in 24,000 chance of you getting into MV Google, you have unrealistic expectations and the salary projections on glassdoor are bs", that is not the attitude I like to see the people who accept those cynical attitudes have no hope of succeeding. Its pretty refreshing to see someone who actually knows about the top level jobs and like yeah f**k it I'll apply to every single one of those packages in my last year of bachelors degree, if I don't get it then its a masters degree followed by careful career planning so I get a promotion or pay rise every ~3 years.

So my question I guess is do you know of any of these packages, a lot like Google Mountain View, which are so good I'll completely abandon my plans of doing a masters and phd because this salary and experience is worth so much more.

Cheers in advance
I don't know the tech industry, but surely you want to be in the position where you are recruited/headhunted rather than have to apply yourself. I.e. you need to be good, really good.
Original post by And what
I see you post on literally all of the computer science boards, you seem really clued up on the stuff I am actually interested in.

The big packages, idgaf about all the other guys on here who have this "urghh its a 1 in 24,000 chance of you getting into MV Google, you have unrealistic expectations and the salary projections on glassdoor are bs", that is not the attitude I like to see the people who accept those cynical attitudes have no hope of succeeding. Its pretty refreshing to see someone who actually knows about the top level jobs and like yeah f**k it I'll apply to every single one of those packages in my last year of bachelors degree, if I don't get it then its a masters degree followed by careful career planning so I get a promotion or pay rise every ~3 years.

So my question I guess is do you know of any of these packages, a lot like Google Mountain View, which are so good I'll completely abandon my plans of doing a masters and phd because this salary and experience is worth so much more.

Cheers in advance


Aha, yeah, I've been found on a few :tongue:

Love it! That's exactly the same attitude I take: not caring how competitive it is and just going for it. Sure, I might not get there but it's not the end of the world and there are other routes of getting to my desired destination.

Google, Facebook (I think they pay the same in London as they do in SV), Amazon, Microsoft (in Seattle), Uber, Snapchat, eBay, Adobe, Linkedin, Bloomberg, Dropbox, Palantir, Twitter and many more, all pay in that ballpark to software engineers, designers and 'product managers'.

Of course the public companies will have more 'liquidity' in terms of stock grants vs a private company, so your 'available total compensation' would be higher at a public company vs say, a smaller startup or private tech company that is yet to be acquired/IPO. That said, if the latter does IPO/get acquired, the upside is usually higher.
Original post by inhuman
I don't know the tech industry, but surely you want to be in the position where you are recruited/headhunted rather than have to apply yourself. I.e. you need to be good, really good.


Large tech companies usually have a policy of not using outside recruiters or headhunters. All sourcing is done via application, recommendation or an internal recruiter reaching out.
Original post by Princepieman
Large tech companies usually have a policy of not using outside recruiters or headhunters. All sourcing is done via application, recommendation or an internal recruiter reaching out.


Indeed.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending