The Student Room Group

This discussion is now closed.

Check out other Related discussions

Should The Death Penalty Be Allowed?

Scroll to see replies

Original post by Underscore__
That is an alternative but until you understand something don't argue about it


Posted from TSR Mobile


Now you're pretending I've argued with you by saying it out loud. I think the only internet arguer tactics left that you haven't tried is telling me to "calm down", calling me "butthurt" and proclaiming "I'm done".

You even pretended you're a lawyer, which is cringeworthy. Most likely you spend a lot of time on the internet, and just to argue. Have you made one single thread about, say, being a student? Exam topics? Bet not.
Original post by ozzyoscy
Now you're pretending I've argued with you by saying it out loud. I think the only internet arguer tactics left that you haven't tried is telling me to "calm down", calling me "butthurt" and proclaiming "I'm done".

You even pretended you're a lawyer, which is cringeworthy. Most likely you spend a lot of time on the internet, and just to argue. Have you made one single thread about, say, being a student? Exam topics? Bet not.


🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥😂😂😂

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by ozzyoscy
Now you're pretending I've argued with you by saying it out loud. I think the only internet arguer tactics left that you haven't tried is telling me to "calm down", calling me "butthurt" and proclaiming "I'm done".

You even pretended you're a lawyer, which is cringeworthy. Most likely you spend a lot of time on the internet, and just to argue. Have you made one single thread about, say, being a student? Exam topics? Bet not.


Haha let me get back to my pretend job


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by Underscore__
Haha let me get back to my pretend job


Posted from TSR Mobile


Let me know how being a 22-year-old 'lawyer' works out for ya.
Original post by MockingJay-
What's your verdict? Is it right to kill someone for killing somebody?


The death penalty shouldn't be used on murderers, it should be used on terrorists
Original post by ozzyoscy
Let me know how being a 22-year-old 'lawyer' works out for ya.


1. When did I say how old I am?
2. What I actually said was I have a training contract, I didn't specify how far along the training process I am


Posted from TSR Mobile
I think it should be only used in extreme cases
Original post by andreicos
I think it should be only used in extreme cases


Who is the judge for such criteria?
Original post by theunitedGOAT
The death penalty shouldn't be used on murderers, it should be used on terrorists


Define terrorists, does Nelson Mandela qualify for death?
Original post by ozzyoscy
I'm seeing the logic of 'killing someone who has killed makes us as bad as they are', in which case that means imprisoning a kidnapper is also wrong and we should let them all go, while thieves should be allowed to keep their possessions.


We don't let murderers go so how do you jump to your stupid conclusions?
Original post by ozzyoscy
HAHAHA oh dear. A lawyer comitting fraud.

So much for being a lawyer - you spent weeks trying to start an argument, and end up being the one shown up. Bodes well for the future.


There you go again, talking about more crimes you don't understand.

1. I didn't start the argument, I simply pointed out you were wrong and you chose to start arguing something you don't understand.
2. I haven't been shown up...


Posted from TSR Mobile
Judges who judge based on a certain criteria...in my view, death penalty is only to be used in cases where one might still have some sort of negative influence, even when locked behind bars...such as terrorist leaders.
Original post by dozyrosie
We don't let murderers go so how do you jump to your stupid conclusions?


I didn't say we let murderers go, and you're the one throwing around the worst 'stupid' and being abusive on the internet. This always works out well.

Original post by Underscore__
There you go again, talking about more crimes you don't understand.

1. I didn't start the argument, I simply pointed out you were wrong and you chose to start arguing something you don't understand.
2. I haven't been shown up...


Posted from TSR Mobile


For goodness sake why are you still quoting me? 22-year-old keyboard warrior 'lawyer'. :lol:
Original post by ozzyoscy
I didn't say we let murderers go, and you're the one throwing around the worst 'stupid' and being abusive on the internet. This always works out well.



For goodness sake why are you still quoting me? 22-year-old keyboard warrior 'lawyer'. :lol:


It's funny that nowhere have I claimed to be a lawyer...


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by Underscore__
It's funny that nowhere have I claimed to be a lawyer...


Posted from TSR Mobile


And another quote.

It was long ago now that your only response was a spelling correction, yet you're still trying to claw something back from this disaster.
Original post by ozzyoscy
I didn't say we let murderers go, and you're the one throwing around the worst 'stupid' and being abusive on the internet. This always works out well.
. :lol:


Surely you are saying that if we do not execute murderers, that would be tantamount to not imprisoning kidnappers and allowing burglars the spoils of their crimes. Sounds like pretty muddled up thinking to me. Murderers in Britain are not executed but they are punished according to the law. I doubt that there has ever been a time when ALL murderers were executed.
Original post by dozyrosie
Surely you are saying that if we do not execute murderers, that would be tantamount to not imprisoning kidnappers and allowing burglars the spoils of their crimes. Sounds like pretty muddled up thinking to me. Murderers in Britain are not executed but they are punished according to the law. I doubt that there has ever been a time when ALL murderers were executed.


I don't recall saying that, and it's certainly not my belief.
Reply 337
Avatar for UDZ
UDZ
12
This is a very sensitive and complex topic. I personally think the whole system should be redone by a bunch of really smart people over a long period of time.
Original post by ozzyoscy
I don't recall saying that, and it's certainly not my belief.


(Original post by ozzyoscy)
I'm seeing the logic of 'killing someone who has killed makes us as bad as they are', in which case that means imprisoning a kidnapper is also wrong and we should let them all go, while thieves should be allowed to keep their possessions.


What else does this mean?
Original post by dozyrosie
(Original post by ozzyoscy)
I'm seeing the logic of 'killing someone who has killed makes us as bad as they are', in which case that means imprisoning a kidnapper is also wrong and we should let them all go, while thieves should be allowed to keep their possessions.


What else does this mean?


That I'm seeing the logic of 'killing someone who has killed makes us as bad as they are', in which case that means imprisoning a kidnapper is also wrong and we should let them all go, while thieves should be allowed to keep their possessions.

Related discussions

Latest

Trending

Trending

Articles for you