anyone know the allocation of marks for all parts of the questions if i remember right it was something like
1a. 3
b. 3

2a. 1
b. 4

3a. 6
b. 3
c. 3
ci. 1

4. 5

5a. 1
b. 11

6a. 3
b. 4

7. 10

8a. 3
b. 4
c. 3
d. 7

Actually think it was
3a. 5
b 3
ci 3
cii

4a 5
b 1

8a 2
bi 4
bii 2
biii 2
c 7

Reply 446

Adam_98

I asked the other guys in my class and 4 of them also got pi/6 for B so I'm pretty sure its right

Posted from TSR Mobile

Reply 447

Barbecuetime123

Original post by Jm098

You know for the last question, will the I simplified version give all of the marks? It said the exact value

Did you get something like 1/2ln(3) -1/2? I've seen a couple of people with this.

Reply 448

Number Nine

Original post by Xzielon

For question 5 I got to y= .5(x^2) - 3ln(x+1) + 2xln(x+1) + c for some point and I don't remember the conditions to solve it. Anyone?

not what i got

Reply 449

Xzielon

Original post by Number Nine

not what i got

I probably wrote down the wrong starting equation. I don't remember what it is.

Reply 450

Jm098

Original post by Barbecuetime123

Did you get something like 1/2ln(3) -1/2? I've seen a couple of people with this.

Unsimplfied version sorry*..! That's the right answer, but I left it in the untidy form

Reply 451

Barbecuetime123

Original post by Jm098

Unsimplfied version sorry*..! That's the right answer, but I left it in the untidy form

Shouldn't be a problem... It's still exact as they asked

Reply 452

Jm098

Original post by Barbecuetime123

Shouldn't be a problem... It's still exact as they asked

Thank you

tough paper ay

Reply 453

CoIIins

For finding the first three non zero terms did anyone get (1+ln32)/4 as the coefficient for the x^2 term? If so was i okay to leave it in this form? As it didn't say simplify for anything did it?

Reply 454

Jm098

Original post by CoIIins

For finding the first three non zero terms did anyone get (1+ln32)/4 as the coefficient for the x^2 term? If so was i okay to leave it in this form? As it didn't say simplify for anything did it?

Can't remember 32 but I got 2.075 for the last approximation

Reply 455

Barbecuetime123

Original post by Jm098

Thank you

tough paper ay

Absolutely, doesn't seem as tough looking back now though, but that's always the case. I think the boundaries will be like 2015's or slightly lower, what do you think?

Reply 456

Jm098

Original post by Barbecuetime123

Absolutely, doesn't seem as tough looking back now though, but that's always the case. I think the boundaries will be like 2015's or slightly lower, what do you think?

Yeah definitely, state of panic in the exam I think. I think they'll be slightly lower. Got full marks on the 2015 paper but then dropped quite a few today:/ wish I would've done it last year haha

Reply 457

Jm098

Seems like everyone has done a lot better in previous papers/years?

Reply 458

-jordan-

Original post by Jm098

Can't remember 32 but I got 2.075 for the last approximation

My FM class all agreed on 2.080 for that.

Reply 459

-jordan-

Original post by CoIIins

For finding the first three non zero terms did anyone get (1+ln32)/4 as the coefficient for the x^2 term? If so was i okay to leave it in this form? As it didn't say simplify for anything did it?