I'm seeing no problems with that. Nice work.. Where you have "True for n=1" I would add "since LHS = RHS" to make it a little clearer. Plus I believe it is assume true for n=k
Only minor things.
That's for Edexcel - you look like u're doing OCR?
I'm seeing no problems with that. Nice work.. Where you have "True for n=1" I would add "since LHS = RHS" to make it a little clearer. Plus I believe it is assume true for n=k
Only minor things.
That's for Edexcel - you look like u're doing OCR?
Yh on OCR. I think it may be assume true for n=k. You know the line under asume true for n=k+1, can I write that because technically that is what I am trying to show?
Yh on OCR. I think it may be assume true for n=k. You know the line under asume true for n=k+1, can I write that because technically that is what I am trying to show?
Write it with a small question mark over the equals sign:
Yh on OCR. I think it may be assume true for n=k. You know the line under asume true for n=k+1, can I write that because technically that is what I am trying to show?
Write it with a small question mark over the equals sign:
Ak+1=?⋯
What in the actual proof?
Do you kind clarifying 8iii. Ive done 8i and 8ii The values that are singular is a=0 and a=2 So for iii I thought there would be solutions for a=3 but none for a=2. Whats the examiners report saying?