The Student Room Group

Do you think the Egyptair crash was a terrorist attack?

Or technical failure possibly?


Posted from TSR Mobile

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1
Avatar for Sambhav1
Sambhav1
1
Terrorist attack probably
Reply 2
Avatar for M14B
M14B
18
Maybe some Buddhist terrorists.
Reply 3
Avatar for SMEGGGY
SMEGGGY
21
If it was a terror group they'd be falling over themselves to make it public

Posted from TSR Mobile
as sad as what happened is, yes, Airbus A320's are highly sophisticated aircraft, there are thousands in the sky every day and it's rather unlikely in my personal opinion to be anything other than a deliberate act. Either that or the maintanence at egyptair is non-existant (which I dont believe to be true)

RIP to those poor people :/
Reply 5
Avatar for oShahpo
oShahpo
20
Unlikely as most of the passengers were Muslim, more than 50%, I also doubt Terrorists could have easily boarded the plane on an Egyptair specially after they have just had the Russian plane incident.
Could've been anything, I dunno
Original post by oShahpo
Unlikely as most of the passengers were Muslim, more than 50%,


Irre****inlevant.

ISIS have been slaughtering ("true") Muslims in Syria and Iraq for years now.

Original post by oShahpo

I also doubt Terrorists could have easily boarded the plane on an Egyptair specially after they have just had the Russian plane incident.


Since the Russian plane incident, it's likely that there was an insider, i.e someone who worked at the CDG airport who placed the bomb somewhere on the plane.
Reply 8
Avatar for animus1
animus1
6
My guess, 55% bomb, 45% mechanical\technical failure.
Very possible it was a failed hijacking which would likely br terrorism.
Due to the location of the crash, Most likely some missile.
Here's an idea, how about we wait to find some evidence instead of just jumping to conclusions based on as good as no information...
There is an article on the scientist american website http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/is-commercial-aviation-as-safe-and-secure-as-we-re-told/

read it before you start talking about terrorist unfound claims
Reply 13
Avatar for Aj12
Aj12
18
Original post by 2016_GCSE
Due to the location of the crash, Most likely some missile.


It was too high for any sort of manpad system, leaving either a fighter or an advanced SAM system. Meaning a state actor, we can definitely rule that out.

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by Aj12
It was too high for any sort of manpad system, leaving either a fighter or an advanced SAM system. Meaning a state actor, we can definitely rule that out.

Posted from TSR Mobile


Could have been air to air missile.
Reply 15
Avatar for Aj12
Aj12
18
Original post by 2016_GCSE
Could have been air to air missile.


Yeah exactly, a fighter jet. Which we can rule out, that airspace is incredibly closely watched, if it was a fighter we'd have confirmation by now.
Original post by Aj12
Yeah exactly, a fighter jet. Which we can rule out, that airspace is incredibly closely watched, if it was a fighter we'd have confirmation by now.


There is stealth aircraft, It could have been carried out by one of these.
Reply 17
Avatar for Aj12
Aj12
18
Original post by 2016_GCSE
There is stealth aircraft, It could have been carried out by one of these.


Now you are just making yourself look stupid.
Original post by Aj12
Now you are just making yourself look stupid.


You do know what stealth aircraft are designed for, Don't you?
Original post by Aj12
Now you are just making yourself look stupid.


You do know what stealth aircraft are designed for, Don't you?

Not been detected by radar, Damage.

Quick Reply

Related discussions

Latest

Trending

Trending

Articles for you