OCR Sources of Law G152 May 2016

Can someone help me with a Precedent question from 2014?

I don't really understand why the mark scheme for the question I've circles says that the court is bound. Shouldn't it NOT be bound according to the three exceptions from the Young v Bristol Aeroplane case?

I've attached the question to the top of this post. Thanks for any help.

What does everyone think about that?
Delegated Legislation wasn't what I was hoping for (wanted precedent) but I think it went very good in my case.

Can't believe they put statutory interpretation 3 years in a row, so I barely looked at it when revising. With Delegated legislation part (b) seemed to be quite tricky and I believe many must have made a mistake by saying (ii) was SI.

Yep - I wrote OIC first, thinking 1) different nations and 2) why on Earth would they put SI on twice. Then changed it to SI at the last minute when I reread the question and it said ministers. Oh well.. The other questions went superbly (DL with Law Reform was exactly what I wanted) so at least they'll give me a lot of marks. It's over now! So I'm forgetting about my mistake and focusing on what went well.

Hope it goes well for you. I personally, wrote OiC, but without much explanation, since it doesn't seems to be an emergency and I don't know how to link it besides the fact that Gvt should transfer their powers themselves rather than delegating it to a minister, in my view. It was very sneaky for them to put the word 'minister' in (ii) because this is what people notice at the face value.

What did everyone out for the first question on reform?? I wrote mainly about the law commission and how it operates but included some points about public influence and pressure groups. I couldn't think of many cases to include though, only the fraud act 2006 and the hunting act 2004 but that was given in the source!

do you think there could be a possibility two of the answers were SI??

That's exactly what we were supposed to do.
I talked auto pressure groups (lobbying, petitioning etc.) and public opinion so that I could make links to the source. I didn't put any cases for them either, however I have included plenty of law when discussing Law commission and Royal commission and how their proposals were made law. I also mentioned how judges could influence law by deciding points of law, such as duty of care in Donoghue v Stevenson (not sure if it was correct though, because the question asked about bodies/people who suggest new laws, not make them).