Speaking from experience... Don't over complicate the question they'll be questions that say explain, discuss, briefly discuss and outline... If it asks for an outline or briefly discuss no need to go OTT on the question.
Civil is usually about the same questions every year (duty, breach, damage and remoteness, three track system and damages) but got a feeling the principle of res ispa loquitor will appear ( ranging anywhere between 5-8 marks)
Very good predictions! assault instead of s47 and an extra actus reus theory, and aims instead of factors, but good guess about res ipsa loquitor!
For example if you got an A in Unit 1 ans a C/D in unit 2, what wll be your overall grade, and has anyone got any predictions of grade boundary for this year
What actually did the gbh question ask for. I've never included intervening acts in gbh questions.
It was something about the criminal liability for s.20 GBH but the scenario mentioned that the brain damage wouldn't have happened if he'd received sufficient medical treatment straight after
Questions were just for anyone that wants to check up... 1) how omissions can be the basis of AR (8 marks) 2) contemp rule (7 marks) 3) assault (8 marks + 2 A03) 4) GBH 20 (10 marks) 5) summary offence procedures, burden and standard of proof (7 marks) 6) 2 aims of sentencing (5 marks)
Tort: 7) breach and one risk factor (8 marks) 8) remoteness in damage (8 marks) - this was a generous question 9) damage and remoteness in negligence ( 8 marks + 2 A03) 10) duty of care ( 8 marks) 11) procedure to negligence claims (5 marks) 12) burden and standard of proof + res ispa loquitor (8 marks)
Just a few questions
Was question 9 just an application of what you did in 8 but applying to dan suing chris? Was question 10 also applying what happened to dan and chris.
It was something about the criminal liability for s.20 GBH but the scenario mentioned that the brain damage wouldn't have happened if he'd received sufficient medical treatment straight after
Omg I'm such an idiot i was wondering why it was a 10 mark question. I didn't have time to include anyway.
Questions were just for anyone that wants to check up... 1) how omissions can be the basis of AR (8 marks) 2) contemp rule (7 marks) 3) assault (8 marks + 2 A03) 4) GBH 20 (10 marks) 5) summary offence procedures, burden and standard of proof (7 marks) 6) 2 aims of sentencing (5 marks)
Tort: 7) breach and one risk factor (8 marks) 8) remoteness in damage (8 marks) - this was a generous question 9) damage and remoteness in negligence ( 8 marks + 2 A03) 10) duty of care ( 8 marks) 11) procedure to negligence claims (5 marks) 12) burden and standard of proof + res ispa loquitor (8 marks)
I forgot to refer to the case for duty of care on question 10 what happen will get 6/8
For example if you got an A in Unit 1 ans a C/D in unit 2, what wll be your overall grade, and has anyone got any predictions of grade boundary for this year
Last year in unit 1 I got 90 UMS And in unit 2 I got 55 UMS and came out with a B
On the criminal section i completely forgot what the burden and standard of proof on the summary offence question, how many marks would that bit be worth.