I wrote about the duty being between dan and Chris and i missed out the causation stuff for the GBH essay. I think i got the mens rea wrong too. I actually getting ready to fail even though i put my blood sweat and tears into law.
I know that was exactly my words! i didn't know if the whole question was on him or it was just briefly???
I got outside the exam and everyone just started talking about euan. I was stressing out about not finishing the exam, i don't have time to talk about euan in an already ridiculously long question.
I wrote about the duty being between dan and Chris and i missed out the causation stuff for the GBH essay. I think i got the mens rea wrong too. I actually getting ready to fail even though i put my blood sweat and tears into law.
I did the same. You'll still get most of the marks. You can drop like 19 marks and get an A.
I wrote about the duty being between dan and Chris and i missed out the causation stuff for the GBH essay. I think i got the mens rea wrong too. I actually getting ready to fail even though i put my blood sweat and tears into law.
It doesn't matter about Dan and Chris! And causation wise you can still get 7/10 you've not failed!
Who the f**k is euan. I didn't even read the passage lol
it was literally a single line at the end where dan gave him some food so he was ill for while too - i wrote the whole duty of care answer on him and chris though i thought that's what it asked
it was literally a single line at the end where dan gave him some food so he was ill for while too - i wrote the whole duty of care answer on him and chris though i thought that's what it asked
So i can still pull of 5 marks for talking about just dan and chris .
I liked criminal, hated tort, but I think it went alright anyway. For the duty of cared owed to Euan, did you guys put that a duty was owed or not?
I concluded it was foreseeable giving someone contaminated food may result in them becoming ill. Proximity in space and time And FJR So concluded a duty was owed :-) what about you?