The exam baffled me so much!
For the criminal section question about s20, was I right in putting the actus reus, men's rea, saying that Binh was reckless and then saying that the medical treatment would not break the chain of causation as it was not palpably wrong? My friend said the question was just about causation (but for, de minimis, thin skull) and it freaked me out! Especially as it's a 10 mark question! I'm worried I'm going to lose out on all those marks!