Hello, Could you please mark my work too
How does Priestley present the characterof Gerald?
GeraldCroft, son of wealthy business owners Mr and Mrs Croft, has been engaged toSheila Birling as a business deal rather than a relationship based on love. Theengagement seems as though it is only based on status and wealth as Sheilascreams with delight as Gerald shows her the diamond ring, she replies bysaying ‘Now I really feel engaged’, this presents to the reader how the Birlingfamily are not interested in making family ties based on love but on how highin status a person is or how much wealth they have. This is also explainedfurther in the stagecraft and setting as the play is set in one room only,suggesting how the family is seen as being all united and all happy at first,but Priestley’s use of pink light to the gradual change to brighter, hardercolours as the Inspector arrives, is a symbol of how Priestley builds uptension, he does this so that the reader can sense that there is going to besomething wrong, and uses a hint of dramatic irony as the audience knows thatthere has been a lot of events happening that the people of 1912 didn’t knowwere going to happen.TheCharacter of Gerald has a mind-set based on social status; he regards people ofhigher class to be more important to him and more humanlike than the lowerclass. When the Inspector is questioning Gerald about his relationship with EvaSmith, he tells Sheila to go away as ‘It’s bound to be unpleasant anddisturbing’; this illustrates how Gerald sees Sheila in a different light toEva. Eva Smith was of a poor background so he didn’t mind ruining her life,this presents his hypocrisy as compared to how he is with Sheila, who is from arather rich background, he didn’t upset Sheila as he knows she is preciousbecause of her family business, he could not afford to lose a business deal.Priestley does this to show the audience that the ruling class is immoral withno value of the lower class. he saw Eva in the bar and she was lonely andseemed as though she had nothing so he took advantage of her gender and hervulnerability to make her his ‘mistress’, this language shows how the upperclass doesn’t regard the women of the lower class to be humanlike, instead theyare shown to be animalistic and can be easily manipulated. He kept Eva in thespare house that he had gained from his friend for free and kept her there to‘keep her away from all the tension she was facing’, he saw great advantage inher being there because he knew he was getting sex for free and he didn’t evenhave to pay for her being there, then later broke his heart which presents howmuch value he gave her. He displays his views about the idea of socialism andwhy socialism is better than capitalism through angering the audience by usingGerald’s hypocrisy towards the different kinds of women. His actions wereimmoral and Priestley uses this to show the reader that the upper class had theauthority to do anything they wished without getting caught. On the otherhand, Priestley shows the nicer, more generous side of Gerald through hisrelationship with Eva. In the beginning of the play when he first met her, theInspector makes Gerald confess what he had done to Eva and in return Geraldreplied ‘I didn’t like the idea of her going back to the Palace bar. I didn’task for anything in return’, the use of repetition emphasises the point that heis putting across towards the Inspector, Priestley does this to show theaudience how Gerald can be nice too; it is not only the bad side of him that ispresented. However, the fact that Gerald had a deep sense of remorse as hehears about her death reflects how strongly he felt for her, this could also bethought provoking for the reader as the reader comes to think why Gerald thenchose to marry Sheila if he genuinely loved Eva, Priestley is being a humanistphilosopher and is presenting the idea of socialism to the reader once again. Thiscould be included by Priestley because he wanted to show his audience thatthere are some humane people that are considerate towards others, and by theinspector he portrays his socialist views and makes the readers have hope forthe people to change. Moreover,the character of Gerald is shown to be resistant to change as he wants to provethat the girl is not real, he agrees with Mr Birling and says at the end of theplay ‘Even then, that may have been all nonsense’, he doesn’t want to admit tohimself that they contributed to the death of Eva / Daisy. He dismisses thethought of her dying and the fact that he has helped led a girl to commitsuicide by diverting the attention from the girl onto his and Sheila’sengagement by saying ‘what about the ring’, this shows how he is selfish andonly cares about himself and his own purposes, Priestley does this to presentthe ideology of the high class and what they feel about the lower class andthis is the main reason why there is no change happening in society, Gerald wascelebrating the fact that the inspector was ‘non-existent’ rather than learningfrom their mistakes, which is what Sheila and Eric learned to do. Priestleyuses the character of Gerald to present to the reader that there should be hopefor change one day if everyone comes learns from their mistakes, maybe that waythere would be no mistakes caused by people and if people were more socialistin 1912, there would not have been a second world war. In additionto this, Gerald is given a very high position by Mr Birling and his family andMr Birling disregards the fact that Gerald had an affair and broke hisdaughter’s heart because Gerald is of a more wealthy background than theBirling’s are, and as Sheila asks him what he did in the Summer, Mrs Birlingtold Sheila that she has to put up with it and that she’ll ‘have to get used toit, just as Mrs B did’, Mrs Birling understands the lengths that have to begone through to achieve social status because she must have been put through ittoo with Mr Birling, and Mrs B knows that Gerald may have been with anotherwoman but doesn’t mention it as they needed this tie to be made between Sheilaand Gerald, in order to raise their social status. The acts of Gerald arediminished compared to Eric as Eric’s actions were made public, and he hasbrought the family name to shame as the people will find out and Mr andMrs B were in danger of being made funof in public. Priestley uses language such as ‘Well I’m ashamed of you’, used by,MrsB to show the audience that the only people that the older generation areashamed of are the people that are showing hope of changing, this makes thereader hate Mrs B and the whole of the older generation that are showing nosigns of change, providing the audience with thoughts rushing through theirminds about why they should actually change to avoid making mistakes. To conclude,the character of Gerald is used as a device by Priestley to show the audience thatthe higher class is very stubborn, resistant to change and holds very littlehope of becoming socialist. He uses the Inspector to portray his message aboutsocialism by being the voice of the Inspector, Priestley uses deliberatelanguage to portray how he is a firm Christian and how he believes thateveryone should be one body and help each other and uses the character ofGerald and Mr Birling as people in high social ranks to present the views ofthe higher class. 5579386��%r��