Yeah... ok. 
Think it's fair to say that Gerrard's mistakes were flattened by the infinite number of times he rescued Liverpool.
Not much difference between them, both hugely prolific goalscoring midfielders, both brilliant at pens, both arguably the greatest PL players for their respective clubs.. I guess Gerrard had a better range of passing, was more versatile etc. but I'm probably being biased
Not much difference between them, both hugely prolific goalscoring midfielders, both brilliant at pens, both arguably the greatest PL players for their respective clubs.. I guess Gerrard had a better range of passing, was more versatile etc. but I'm probably being biased
Original post by Hugs31
Think it's fair to say that Gerrard's mistakes were flattened by the infinite number of times he rescued Liverpool.
Not much difference between them, both hugely prolific goalscoring midfielders, both brilliant at pens, both arguably the greatest PL players for their respective clubs.. I guess Gerrard had a better range of passing, was more versatile etc. but I'm probably being biased
Not much difference between them, both hugely prolific goalscoring midfielders, both brilliant at pens, both arguably the greatest PL players for their respective clubs.. I guess Gerrard had a better range of passing, was more versatile etc. but I'm probably being biased
Pretty much this, although I would pick Lampard over Gerrard.
Doesn't matter because Scholes is better than both of them.
Original post by sr90
Doesn't matter because Scholes is better than both of them.
Except he wasn't.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by Mackay
Euro 2004:
James
Neville, Terry, Campbell, A Cole
Beckham, Scholes, Lampard, Gerrard
Rooney, Owen
How did that team not win a ****ing tournament? Or even make the SFs?
James
Neville, Terry, Campbell, A Cole
Beckham, Scholes, Lampard, Gerrard
Rooney, Owen
How did that team not win a ****ing tournament? Or even make the SFs?
Because the midfielders were shoe horned into a shite formation designed to try and accommodate them.
Original post by scriggy
Because the midfielders were shoe horned into a shite formation designed to try and accommodate them.
That didn't make a difference, to be honest. Gerrard was arguably our man of the match against Switzerland, Scholes scored twice against Croatia, Lampard had the game of his life against Portugal.
I guess Rooney's injury massively affected our mentality in the QFs.
Original post by bammy jastard 27
What doesn't make sense is why England didn't just play a diamond?
Now England play a diamond when their central midfielders are ****...
Now England play a diamond when their central midfielders are ****...
IIRC, when Sven was around we always played with a diamond, and still fell short.
Original post by James.Carnell
IIRC, when Sven was around we always played with a diamond, and still fell short.
It was a wide diamond.
Lets not pretend they were completely conned against Portugal. Beckhams dead penalty against France too.
Original post by Jimmy Seville
Lets not pretend they were completely conned against Portugal. Beckhams dead penalty against France too.
France game should have been sewn up by the time Zidane decided to get his arse in gear.
Quick Reply
Related discussions
- Who is the best ALL ROUND footballer at the moment?
- Chelsea F.C. Thread IX
- Will Everton get relegated in 2022/23?
- Which former players would excel in today's game?
- Zidane vs. Maradonna
- Just made a bet with a rival fan.
- The Manchester United Thread XXIII
- The Liverpool FC Thread XVII
- How to stop over-perfectionism.
- BATH - Integrated Meng and Eeng
- Can't stop comparing myself to others
- English Language vs. English Literature
- Communication skills
- Societies at uni
- Is Intelligence not as big an attraction as it was?
- feeling misunderstood
- GCSE grades for cambridge law, can i get in?
- Top 15 universities
- too insecure for a relationship
- trying to make internet friends but feel bad when people talk to me
