This year paper is easier than last year. I would say around 68-70 out of 80 for an A and 80 out of 80 for full ums
I agree that it was easier than last year but last year was only 62 for an A, the year before that was 66 and i would say the june 14 paper was the same difficulty level as this one
I agree that it was easier than last year but last year was only 62 for an A, the year before that was 66 and i would say the june 14 paper was the same difficulty level as this one
also are people really sure the a boundary will be as high as 67? It seemed like an odd paper to me, there were a few things that I hadn't seen before that could trip people up - like the polarisation question, the one about bonds and some of the one markers.
also are people really sure the a boundary will be as high as 67? It seemed like an odd paper to me, there were a few things that I hadn't seen before that could trip people up - like the polarisation question, the one about bonds and some of the one markers.
I agree I thought it was weird - never seen a lot of those questions before. I don't think they'll be as high as people are predicting (or I hope haha)
I agree I thought it was weird - never seen a lot of those questions before. I don't think they'll be as high as people are predicting (or I hope haha)
yep me too! Cant see how it will be that high there were lots of small weird questions im thinking (hoping) more between 64 and 67 not 67 and 70
Are edexcel going to fairly standardise the boundaries?? Every year the students retaking AS are helped by those who mess it up in the year below, lowering the boundaries.. this year there are no AS students! I'd say 65/80 is fair for an A?
The highest its been recently is 66 and i think a lot of people found this easy because it's the second time of asking. Thoughts?
I think you're also forgetting that the people who usually get As in the exam first time round didn't take that exam because they already did well first time round. So that leaves re-sit students who didn't do well first time round. Some of them might have not put much effort into the re-sit either.
I think the GBs will be moderately high as it was pretty straight forward, but I've heard some people suggest 70+ for an A which is absolute nonsense. It will be around 67 for an A imo.
I did that too, think its wrong but hopefully if you drew the more charged ion getting deflected more we'll get ECF marks
well when u ionise something in mass spectra you can get a +1 charge and +2 charge and more etc etc i think this because in previous papers i saw a question talking about what would happen to m/e value if the charge on the ionised ion was +2? so i assume that can happen and should be the correct answer
well when u ionise something in mass spectra you can get a +1 charge and +2 charge and more etc etc i think this because in previous papers i saw a question talking about what would happen to m/e value if the charge on the ionised ion was +2? so i assume that can happen and should be the correct answer
also are people really sure the a boundary will be as high as 67? It seemed like an odd paper to me, there were a few things that I hadn't seen before that could trip people up - like the polarisation question, the one about bonds and some of the one markers.
Those questions always come up in every paper though. Apart from about 5-8 marks, there wasn't really anything we haven't seen before in past papers.