The Student Room Group
Uni students - Complete our survey >>
Uni students - Complete our survey >>
Uni students - Complete our survey >>

2016 Official AQA New Spec AS Level Physics Paper 2 - 9th June 2016

Scroll to see replies

Reply 200
Avatar for 11234
11234
8
Did anyone get 114W for one of the solar panels
Literally that was worse than both spec papers combined why r u doing this to us AQA
Where tf were the optics questions????!!!!
What did you put for the earthquake one about the graph reading?
Original post by BoeyJ
Very hard paper. Lack on double slit outside of MCQs was surprising. Also more materials was a shock. No 6 marker was the only advantage of that paper. Also, people who are moaning about time issues I can guarantee 80% didn't finish that as when I looked forward when they called time most were still writing. After the errors in Tuesday's Biology paper it's hardly surprising there was more (Q9). I thought the reason it was difficult is that it was a paper designed to force errors not test knowledge. I mean having to know area of a sphere equation and guess areas of solar panel installations are examples of that. Grade Boundaries will be low though and at least it's only a mock :smile:


This is worded perfectly, Ifeel as if this is what the examiners were trying to do in ocr c1, and this exam. Theyre not really testing your actual knowledge, but your ability to not **** up ambiguous questions you've never seen before, in a pressured situation. Its kinda unfair tbh
Original post by mstrcvk
It was 2.7mm


I measured 2.5 mm


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by 11234
Did anyone get 114W for one of the solar panels


Yep, what was the area question asking with order of magnitude?
Original post by Jay_lal
What was the answers for Q2 with the zero error


i got 0.51mm
Original post by 11234
Did anyone get 114W for one of the solar panels


I did
Reply 209
Avatar for Al_YG
Al_YG
5
Original post by 11234
did anyone get 114w for one of the solar panels


yessss i'm so happy i know i got 1 mark!!!
OH I remember putting 2.9mm for Q1 now - would that have been right?
Original post by mstrcvk
It was 2.7mm


How was it 2.7?


Posted from TSR Mobile
How did u work out the force to put in the young modulus formula?


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by moshe015
i got 0.51mm


I got this too
Looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool

vry hard ppr
Original post by omer_bawa
How did u work out the force to put in the young modulus formula?

Mass of the mass (5.8 kg) multiplied my acceleration due to gravity(9.81) f=ma
Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by sophbunny161
I got this too


:smile:
first extention question was 2.7-0.9= 1.8mm ??
what was the answer to the diameter question?, anyone get 0.3mm?
did people get four for the number of components??
i got 4.39... and rounded it down

Quick Reply

Related discussions

Latest

Trending

Trending

Articles for you