What did everyone put for effects on % uncertainty. I put increase % u in area but decrease in extension because greater extension so more measurable and thus less % uncertainty
Wait do you mean there was a grapgh of diodes but one showed V/I and other showed I/V
No some guy commented earlier that it wasn't an I-V graph, but most people would have assumed so given the rush to finish, but a V-I graph. But I'm not too sure about this
No some guy commented earlier that it wasn't an I-V graph, but most people would have assumed so given the rush to finish, but a V-I graph. But I'm not too sure about this
Im pretty sure it was a regular I-V so A Im guessing the flipped one might have been used to catch out people who thought its reversed because of the resistor
What did everyone put for effects on % uncertainty. I put increase % u in area but decrease in extension because greater extension so more measurable and thus less % uncertainty
What did everyone put for effects on % uncertainty. I put increase % u in area but decrease in extension because greater extension so more measurable and thus less % uncertainty
I put the uncertainity increases on measuring diameter using calliper if it decreased and i couldnt think of second one so i put systematic error eill increase as accuracy is decreased :/
This is what I remember... 114W for power... 2.11*10^whatever for ym in MCQ 4 resistors 10,000microvolts(or volts unsure) Y=mx+c so line graph was better for section A question Lamda/4 for alpha in MCQ f stayed the same in MCQ The rest is a blur....👀
I think it asked "What is the maximum amount of components you can add without reaching maximum power" or something. So I imagine you have to round down or you will go over the max power.
Ah, I see, I think I read it wrong then since I would usually round down unless something said otherwise - my bad.