The Milo Yiannoppulos anti-cultural Marxism phenomenon

I strongly dislike his style and most of his views on most issues. That's probably because, as he himself says, he's a provocateur. He's basically a successful troll. But he's jingoistic and ill informed, he LOVES prejudice and stereotype and that's why right-wingers love him. He satirises and express prejudices even about himself. Which is a good thing in my book but doesn't detract from the fact that he's clownish about matters which affect the lives of millions of people.

So the origin of Jesus is not important? OK then.
BTW why do you think Christianity is called an Abrahamic religion?

*yawns* the usual type of rant from a right-wing, MGTOW, Yiannopoulos supporter which kills brain cells, nothing new.

I shall be quoting from Bruce Metzgers book "The Text of the New Testament". This is the first edition and is from pages 99 and 100. Here is what Bruce writes about the Textus Receptus created by Erasmus in the 16th century:



So literally, many verses in the Textus Receptus were literally created by Erasmus in the 16th century. How can you argue that Greek texts invented by Erasmus in the 16th century are more reliable than the Greek manuscripts we now use, with some dating to within 30 years of the originals?

because the manuscripts are 95% similar to the original Bible in common Greek.

Among the criticisms levelled at Erasmus one of the most serious appeared to be he charge of Stunica, one of the editors of Ximenes' Complutensian Polyglot, that his text lacked part of the final chapter of 1 John, namely the Trinitarian statement concerning 'the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. And there are three that bear witness in earth'. Erasmus replied that he had not found any Greek manuscript containing these words, though he had in the meanwhile examined several others besides those he had relied when first preparing his text. In an unguarded moment Erasmus promised that he would insert the Comma Johanneum, as it is called, in future editions if a single Greek manuscript could be found that contained the passage. At length such a copy was found - or was made order! As it now appears, the Greek manuscript had probably been written in Oxford about 1520 by a Franciscan friar named Froy who took the disputed words from the Latin Vulgate. Erasmus stood by his promise and inserted the passage in his third edition (1522).

Among the thousands of Greek manuscripts of the New Testament examined since the time of Erasmus, only three others are known to contain this spurious passage. They are Greg. 88, a twelfth-century manuscript which has the Comma written in the margin in a seventeenth-century hand; Tisch. w 110, which is a sixteenth-century manuscript copy of the Complutensian Polyglot Greek text; and Greg. 629 dating from the fifteenth-[century].

So It isn't necessarily more reliable, but it is just as reliable.

It also doesn't change the fact that Catholics are unscriputaraly going against Bible verses such as 1st Timothy 2 verse 5 about Jesus being the only link between God and man, and not Mary.

And verses about Jesus being the only person that can absolve you of your sins, not priests or bishops as catholics believe.

We have had the media and education establishments become cultural Marxist indoctrination centres trying to brainwash people with things like feminism, false wage gap statistics, white privilege, a need to import people, "feminists" which trumpet Islam, safe spaces, trigger warnings, micro aggressions and micro issues that are non issues that need to be set up as issues, and then any opposition needs to be shut down by the progressive left. The progressive left generates people who act like Neanderthals who have a set of prejudiced and want to physically rip down anyone who does not support their prejudices.

This is all history now. It's dead. One leading figure who works for Donald Trump and who is a very popular ridiculer of the progressive left is Milo Yiannoppulos.





Anti-milo protesters "triggered":

He's mostly right about stuff he says about feminism, but not about race.

His own white privilege makes him ignorant to the real plight of minorities.

Posted from TSR Mobile

He's mostly right about stuff he says about feminism, but not about race.

His own white privilege makes him ignorant to the real plight of minorities.

Posted from TSR Mobile

He's mostly right about stuff he says about feminism, but not about race.

His own white privilege makes him ignorant to the real plight of minorities.

Posted from TSR Mobile

There is no such thing as white privilege.

There is no such thing as white privilege.

I disagree with a lot of things the bloke says. like claiming that lesbians don't exist. However, I also agree with a lot and he is very entertaining.

I think it is good that he isn't afraid of stating a lot of home truths and for defending freedom of speech.

I agree that like many conservatives he seems to think that we ought to be able to say literally anything. Apart from that, what else do you agree with him on? (what are the other "home truths"?) he's mostly outrageous and comically provocative.

I assume you think I was born yesterday if you think I am falling for that one.

Good day, sir.

Posted from TSR Mobile