The Student Room Group

Official Thread: OCR MEI S2/M1

Scroll to see replies

Original post by Bruhh
When using the normal tables with a z value to 4+ significant figures do you guys take an average from the 'add' column since my values always seem to be 1 out in the 4th decimal place but we were never taught to take an average.


you dont have to do that!!! the mark scheme always says correct answer to 3sf!!
Reply 21
Original post by Gabriella98
you dont have to do that!!! the mark scheme always says correct answer to 3sf!!


Ah it does indeed, so I'm perfectly fine doing it slightly less accurately.
Reply 22
Pls help. WHat definitions and worded answers do we need to know of for s2
Reply 23
Original post by ComputerMaths97
Do probabilities to 4.d.p and other values to 3 or 4 significant figures depending on the value.

For example 0.487548375384 should be 0.4875
125.3258 should be 125.3
83.2142352 should be 83.2 or 83.21 depending on which you prefer, both get the marks.

Just never go beyond 4 s.f for solutions. However remember to never use rounded values in your calculations.


What about contingency table contributions e.g 1.2345, 0.1234 or 1.234 and 0.1234 as examples for two contingencies?
hey can anyone give me an explanation on how to interpret contributions to the x^2 statistic? confused...
Reply 25
When we calculate contributions do we use the rounded expected value e.g 10.46 or the exact value 136/13
Original post by ABeingOnEarth
hey can anyone give me an explanation on how to interpret contributions to the x^2 statistic? confused...


THe x^2 contribution is a way of quanitvativly diplaying the difference between the result observed and the result expected. Thus the larger the discrepency between the two the larger the contribution. If the sum of the contributions are larger than the x^2 critical value for your test then the result is significant.

Furmulae is (O-E)^2 / E where O is observed value and E is expected.

Do that for each cell and sum the total to find the x^2 contrivution value!

Hope that helps mate and just ask if need any help with anything else
Original post by 11234
Pls help. WHat definitions and worded answers do we need to know of for s2


Definition of Significance level usually comes up and understand advantages and disadvantages of high/low level.

Know the circumstances in which specific tests are used. Eg Poisson for when p is small and N is large.

PMCC when the scatter diagram shows a linear corolation and the data is a a bivariate normal distribution.

Spearmens Rank when the data on a diagram is in a non linear pattern.

Know what an indpenedatn/dependant variable is.
Original post by hunter0raf42
THe x^2 contribution is a way of quanitvativly diplaying the difference between the result observed and the result expected. Thus the larger the discrepency between the two the larger the contribution. If the sum of the contributions are larger than the x^2 critical value for your test then the result is significant.

Furmulae is (O-E)^2 / E where O is observed value and E is expected.

Do that for each cell and sum the total to find the x^2 contrivution value!

Hope that helps mate and just ask if need any help with anything else


Thanks very much!!
Original post by 11234
When we calculate contributions do we use the rounded expected value e.g 10.46 or the exact value 136/13


the MS usually has the rounded decimal value. i usually put both so i can use the exact values in my calculations but still see the decimal values for if they ask you to comment on the contributions
It seems like there is always 1 unusual/more difficult question in each paper, and then then the rest is all the same.
S2 is really easy if you do past papers.

If you don't, you're screwed.
Original post by ComputerMaths97
S2 is really easy if you do past papers.

If you don't, you're screwed.


Its such an anal unit. If you dont hit that buzzword you lose marks, adn the boundires are usually v high. Its v v annoyinh although not very hard to get your head around
Reply 33
This paper last year had unreal grade boundaries..

Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 34
Original post by hunter0raf42
Its such an anal unit. If you dont hit that buzzword you lose marks, adn the boundires are usually v high. Its v v annoyinh although not very hard to get your head around


Concept is okay to understand, but theres the twisty questions at end of some poisson and normal distrib questions. And those questions involving writing I can never get right.. explain this/comment on contribution/define this/why is this this.. goodness gracious.


Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 35
Original post by ComputerMaths97
There are many approaches, but here's how I do these:

Since we need to find a range (a<x<b) such that 90% (p=0.9) of the data points fit within that range, I like to go for a symmetrical range.

Therefore the range from p=0.05 to p=0.95
In this range, 90% of the data is here.

Therefore, we have two things to solve:
1) P( x < a) = 0.05 (we want to find the value of a for which only 5% of the data is under it)
Solving this is pretty simple, simply being:
P( z < [a-mean]/s.d) = 0.05
And therefore [a-mean]/s.d = inverse-phi(0.05)
= -inverse-phi(0.95)
= -1.645
Then you can just solve a, since you would've been given the mean and the standard deviation in the question

2) P(x > b) = 0.05 (we want to find the value of b for which only 5% of the data is over it)
Solve the same as normal.

This will give two values (a and b) such that they collectively contain 90% (0.9) of the data. So say for example we get a = 135 and b=165
It would be true that P(135 < x < 165) = 0.9
Therefore 90% of the data is between 135 and 165

Hope this helped!


Brilliant explanation, thank you! Dont mind if this comes up now :biggrin:

Posted from TSR Mobile
How did everyone find that? :smile:
Well.
Wasn't too bad, apart from MEI trying to confuse everyone with the choice of scale for the scatter graph 😂
Feel like Ive got the test stat for the last question wrong I got like 1/3 which was miles away from z critical

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending