I'm somebody who knows a lot about LSD, actually. you *clearly* haven't the first clue about it.
You're the idiot who asked "why not ban alcohol"
yes because you're wanting a policy that doesn't work - why not apply that policy that doesn't work to *everything*? I'm just asking for some consistency! you said prohibition doesn't work - then why are you saying we should prohibit coke? do you think prohibition didn't work because it was specifically alcohol that was banned? :' ) nah.
Re-legalise the ownership of guns. Daily reminder that PEOPLE kill, not guns. Serbia and Switzerland have gun ownership legalised and they're doing just fine : )
Re-legalise the ownership of guns. Daily reminder that PEOPLE kill, not guns. Serbia and Switzerland have gun ownership legalised and they're doing just fine : )
Equally though they get no benefit from those guns, so what would be the point?
1 cost is the cost on the nhs to treat people. another cost is the less productivity as people get ill/ benefits claiming.
mate, to overdose from LSD you would have to *snort* ****ing *grams* of it, and a typical dose is about 100 *micro* grams (give or take), on your tongue via a blotter. LSD isn't dangerous. it can be uncomfortable if you take too much, but you wouldn't be able to do anything if you took too much (i.e. if you're suggesting harming other people). it would sedate you quite a lot and would make you *very* willing to sit down and relax. that's distinct from alcohol where you might become aggressive.
there's only been about 1 case of an overdose from LSD, and the person/persons recovered rather quickly
Consistency? Coke is banned rn. alcohol isnt. Thats consistency. The scientists split it into class A, class B etc etc and alcohol isnt part of that.
coke and alcohol are both drugs you muppet - that's the consistency I was talking about - why ban one and not the other? if anything alcohol is worse for you than coke.
Re-legalise the ownership of guns. Daily reminder that PEOPLE kill, not guns. Serbia and Switzerland have gun ownership legalised and they're doing just fine : )
Shhhh, guns have a mind of their own remember the person who does it doesn't matter only the tool
Mine would be a law that would allow me to have as many laws as i want because i can't come up with one right now. I had chemistry today and i used up all my energy on thatU
Following John Locke, I would introduce a law saying, that those for whom toleration is not their own rule, will be punished by fine, prison, capital punishment and/or deportation, depending on crime against toleration they commited and where they come from.
Any true statement (based on facts, substantive, proven), would not be treated as lack of tolerance, no matter how much the desribed person or group would feel it to be insulting.
This would solve problems of fundamental extremism, racism and censorship of political correctness in the same time. Of course, only when introduced utterly and with police having the undivided control over every single street in the country, as they used to have in the past.
Firearms would allow to overthrow the state and introduce an anarchy, which must cause some gangs and mafias to take power over, so this would free people from tyranny of the state, and and introduce a tyrranny of gangs.
This will be controversial, but I'd love to ban chewing gum - I really hate seeing it stuck to things, under chairs, all over pavements, and it's not nice seeing someone chewing gum either, especially while they are talking, or if they play with it and stretch it in their hands - eww