Did anyone do scenario 2? What did you guys put? Spent about 10 minutes debating which scenario to do
I did assault Then debated s20 and s18, then settled with s18, Then said battery for the kick can contribute, and then did self defence Second but I did murder and the unlawful act, didn't have time to write about gross
I did assault Then debated s20 and s18, then settled with s18, Then said battery for the kick can contribute, and then did self defence Second but I did murder and the unlawful act, didn't have time to write about gross
I don't think there was, unless you could argue duty of care via omission ? Through course of events (miller) I don't understand gross negligence so I didn't write about it, and I don't think you can do omissions as a duty if care like in caparo. But I barely wrote anything for unlawful, an area I'm not confident on. What did you do for scenario 2?
For sceniorio 2, I wrote about Assault for Genna opening the windows/doors because Helen was scared etc think skull rule. Would that be correct? & for question 2, I spoke about loss of control, Gross & Unlawful act manslaught but did we also have to talk about murder????
Battery , consent, s.20 gbh , causation , self defence for the first question? Not sure if I got that correct
Then murder , DR and gross negligence?
There was a lot required for scenario 1 Q1.
Adam to Brandon Battery ABH GBH s20 Consent (discussion of horseplay and properly conducted sports) Assault (fear after being repeatedly hit)
Adam to Calvin Battery ABH GBH s20 Causation in relation to s20 3rd party intervention. (still operating at the end of day, need not be sole cause) Self defence
Calvin to Adam Assault (reference to Tuberville issues)
For scenario 1criminal law did anyone do Abh for the injuries to Calvin instead of assault as he lay there for 30minutes unconscious insinuating more than just assault?
Sorry I meant did anyone do ABH for the injuries to Brandon for being repeatedly hit with the ball. Obvious that the injuries to calvin laying unconscious was GBH I think Hope it went well everyone..not sure how I feel about it yet
I only did murder for scenario two because I ran out of time, what's the maximum mark I could get? For question 1 I put the defences; intoxication, self defence and insanity??
I did question 3 in section A the intoxication one but I feel the second part of that wasn't really reform and I think the way it was worded was really confusing, I just said that it is available of u aren't at fault because of the fall back principle but again it's not available as a defence because u will still get charged even if u had no intention
then I did scenario 3 in vol manslaughter but I didn't mention unlawful act manslaughter because I didn't think it was relieved but I did mention gross negligent and a bit of reckless less
I also found the case law didn't really match the scenario but I put them in anyway so I think I did 5 cases
I did robbery for section c but I found that it was very repetitive and I think only one statement he committed robbery
Adam to Brandon Battery ABH GBH s20 Consent (discussion of horseplay and properly conducted sports) Assault (fear after being repeatedly hit)
Adam to Calvin Battery ABH GBH s20 Causation in relation to s20 3rd party intervention. (still operating at the end of day, need not be sole cause) Self defence
Calvin to Adam Assault (reference to Tuberville issues)
I did pretty much the exact same as you however in relation to Brandon I didn't put GBH I just did battery amounting to Abh as I don't believe that constitutes to serious harm? However it doesn't matter as its how you justify it