I did assault Then debated s20 and s18, then settled with s18, Then said battery for the kick can contribute, and then did self defence Second but I did murder and the unlawful act, didn't have time to write about gross
I did exactly the same as you, except I didn't put self defence and I put gross negligence for the second question. Good luck!
I did scenario 2, I did: Q 1- assault, battery, s.18/s.20 wounding Q Q 2- Gross neg, loss of control, unlawful act
I mistakenly didn't read the 'murder of' in Q2 and assumed it was gross when i read the scenario. How many marks would i lose for doing gross instead of murder? and would my loss of control be marked? because I don't know if it is a defense for gross??
I did scenario 2 for the first question I did assault of Genna and then Helen battery occasioning s.20 wounding to Genna and self defence and then for second question murder with loss of control and unlawful act manslaughter very briefly
I did scenario 2, I did: Q 1- assault, battery, s.18/s.20 wounding Q Q 2- Gross neg, loss of control, unlawful act
I mistakenly didn't read the 'murder of' in Q2 and assumed it was gross when i read the scenario. How many marks would i lose for doing gross instead of murder? and would my loss of control be marked? because I don't know if it is a defense for gross??
Loss of control is only a defence to murder, as it is partial and brings it down to manslaughter. Gross neg is a basic intent, therefore you're looking at the general defences, not the special ones for murder. Did you do any defences in section 1 ? And how did you justify it was gross, because I only had time for unlawful
I did scenario 2, I did: Q 1- assault, battery, s.18/s.20 wounding Q Q 2- Gross neg, loss of control, unlawful act
I mistakenly didn't read the 'murder of' in Q2 and assumed it was gross when i read the scenario. How many marks would i lose for doing gross instead of murder? and would my loss of control be marked? because I don't know if it is a defense for gross??
I think you'll still get your marks for the loss of control but depending on how much depth you went into for unlawful act manslaughter you probably could have got 17 marks, so it shouldn't be too bad
I did scenario 2 Q4-Assault to Helen S.20 to Genna/self - defence Q5-didn't manage to do one part of the question as I ran out of time. For the other part I did manslaughter by unlawful & dangerous act. I mentioned loss of control but not sure if that would actually apply
I did scenario 2 Q4-Assault to Helen S.20 to Genna/self - defence Q5-didn't manage to do one part of the question as I ran out of time. For the other part I did manslaughter by unlawful & dangerous act. I mentioned loss of control but not sure if that would actually apply
Loss of control is only a defence to murder, as it is partial and brings it down to manslaughter. Gross neg is a basic intent, therefore you're looking at the general defences, not the special ones for murder. Did you do any defences in section 1 ? And how did you justify it was gross, because I only had time for unlawful
I did a duty via an omission (miller) and no I did no defences for section 1
I wrote battery for the injuries on Brandon, they werent serious
I think ABH and even s20 had to be considered. Red swelling and sting pain is arguably ABH by nature. The repeated kicking compounded by the fact that Brandon was much smaller than Adam gave scope to use Bollom and Brown Stratton for GBH justification.