Does this explain the manosphere?

Men suffering is men's fault? What.

Men don't have bluetooth in their dicks where everyone can communicate with each other.

Your statement is like saying, "Black people are discriminated against by police for a reason, they commit more crimes".

Do you agree with that? Perhaps you are an advocate for discrimination, I'm not sure.

In the past I haven't really got involved in this "red pill" crap because the whole thing is toxic and I'm gay so I don't really care. But I had to laugh when a friend clued me on to two of the "manosphere" big wigs, which prompted me to research a little about the "movement". And suddenly it all made sense; why they are so desperately unhappy and bitter against women, why they act generally like complete losers.

Now keep in mind these two bozos below are constantly talking about being an "alpha" male, how they bang loads of women, how women shouldn't be allowed to own property or vote or get a university education. I give you Exhibit 1, Matt Forney



He's got a face like a scalded ballsack, all the physical charisma of a hemorrhoid and a child molestery look about him. Presumably he channeled all his rage at female rejection into a misogynistic feedback loop of low self-esteem and hatred that further reduces his prospects to have sexual relations with a woman.

Matt Forney is apparently a big cheese in the "manosphere" world. He regularly writes articles about how women are to be treated (badly, he tells us; they love it apparently) and how men can increase their prospects with the opposite sex by calling women retards and denying that sex requires consent. Tbh even using the ludicrous standards of the manosphere world, Forney looks weak, passive, effeminate and gross.

Exhibit 2 is Dean Esmay, another player in the manosphere world



Surely it's a mistake that a neckbeard who looks like he spends his days and nights in his Mum's basement masturbating to pictures of women dressed as a fantasy orc can be offering advice on the fairer sex to other men.

I'm genuinely curious what proportion of men are into this subculture. None of my straight guy friends are into this stuff so I don't really have anyone to ask IRL. But having dipped my toe in to this subculture and seeing the sort of weirdos these people look up to, it only confirms my previous impressions.

Really? I mean firstly I don't think black people have ever been in a position of superiority, they've pretty much always been discriminated against.

Secondly, in the scenarios I have mentioned, yes we as men have reaped what we sowed.

Funnily enough if you all but force women to be child rearers and men breadwinners, then when it comes time to decide who gets the child, you choose the child rearer. Can't help but think if we just removed these roles the court issues would disappear as they would both be equally valid options.

.

But seriously though your average red pill type is those guys. I can honestly say I've honestly never met anybody in my life who was inspired to hate women as a result of being found to be attractive to an abundance of them.......

The main point is he was very against self-improvement and believed he was entitled to pussy without having to do anything. That is the polar opposite to what red pill/PUA mentality entails.

Not really, it's just a very slight variation. Both feel entitled to get laid, define their self-worth by how often they get laid. They differ merely regarding what kind of man is rightly so entitled.

Why does it matter if they've ever held positions of superiority...the discrimination is happening right now?

So men suffer for others' actions, and you are just totally fine with that? Jesus Christ.

How are people "forcing" women to be child rearers? If they get child custody, its 99.9% of the time because she wanted the child. The mother has lots of options when having a child which men don't have, prime example terminating the pregnancy. Everybody has a choice whether they become a mother/father or not.

These guys and the feminists should be sent to the gulags

Together

Because the whole point is that the minor injustices I am referring to are a result of those who have typically held the dominant/powerful position now having to shift to a equal system. Given black people have always been discriminated against, it's not an applicable example in the slightest.

I also think you're confused about what I am saying. I'm not saying it's right that men have faced injustices, in an ideal world there would be none. What I am saying is that the areas of injustice referred to by mens rights advocates always exist as an accidental result of discrimination against women.

If you don't think we have historically made it the woman's "place" to bring up the children and look after the household, then I suggest you look at history. When you dedicate an entire gender to a role, funnily enough they're going to be the first choice when you go to court to decide who will do that role.

Men have a choice regarding having a child, they can either wrap it or they can't. Complaining that a woman doesn't want to suffer for 9 months for a child they don't want is infringing on your rights as a man is simply ridiculous.

"Discrimination against men is due to discrimination against women"

Classic.

The problem here is you are being too collectivist. You aren't viewing individual situations as such. Am I surprised that a court is more likely to give a women custody because of "past roles"? Well yes, because it means the courts aren't viewing the cases as individual instances, but rather assigning the situation to a general trend. My example is similar, REGARDLESS of who you think is discriminated against, because as I said, it's about individuals.

lol what

I find the Manosphere a bizarre place ranging between absolutely foul and just plain ridiculous, and I have to admit I do find it quite amusing when self-proclaimed alpha males are clearly losers in real life. That said, I don't want to just take the piss out of their looks. It's not their looks that made them misogynistic dicks, they made choices to be like that.

It's true that their rejection comes from choices they made but that also ties into their physical appearance. If they so choose, they could go to the gym. They could wear vaguely decent clothes. If they paired that with choosing to be a nicer and more interesting person they would have much greater success with women.

I'm gay and I've slept with women. I'm not by any means particularly hot or amazing physically, I'm in okay shape. How is it that I can get with women and they can't? It's because they choose to be disgusting slobs and then aggravate that by becoming total dicks rendering themselves completely repulsive to women.

If that were true then they wouldn't encourage any actions which lead towards getting laid because you'd already be entitled.

I've typically found having a remotely palatable personality works just fine without hitting the gym. Although which is more effort depends on your starting position I suppose.